From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:32:00 +0200, Thomas Heger    
   wrote:   
      
   >Am Dienstag000007, 07.10.2025 um 10:51 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >> Den 07.10.2025 10:05, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>> Am Sonntag000005, 05.10.2025 um 12:38 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >>>> Den 05.10.2025 11:00, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>>>> Am Samstag000004, 04.10.2025 um 20:39 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >>>>>> Den 02.10.2025 09:52, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The universe has actually no time, because time is a LOCAL measure.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Your local time will always point into the future, but only into   
   >>>>>>> your LOCAL future!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Other observers in other locations have a local future, too, but   
   >>>>>>> that can actually be your past.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are on the Earth and I am on the Moon.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Can you give an example where my local future is yor local past?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> (Or vice versa if you prefer.)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Not, because the distance between Moon and Earth is real valued.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If you turn the axis of time upside down, this would be an   
   >>>>> 'imaginary rotation'.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> This would be a valid timeline, too, but in world, which is made   
   >>>>> from anti-matter.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Such an 'anti-world' would be perfectly normal, though only for   
   >>>>> anti- beings living there.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But we couldn't go there, because contact to anti-matter would make   
   >>>>> us detonate instantly.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> TH   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So if my local future were your local past, then the world   
   >>>> would explode?   
   >>>   
   >>> No, you would.   
   >>>   
   >> OK.   
   >> Since you are not trying to defend your statement:   
   >>   
   >>   "Other observers in other locations have a local future,   
   >>    too, but that can actually be your past."   
   >>   
   >> . . you must have realised that it is meaningless nonsense.   
   >   
   >It is an assumption.   
   >   
   >This assumption says, that time is local only.   
      
   It is not an assumption. Einstein's time is only based on...'local   
   only'...it's caled...Relativity.   
      
   Einstein's time is local time. loco time. cuckoo time. cuckoo means   
   loco, loco means local in the coco.   
      
    Locoregional describes something confined to a specific,   
      
   loco place...local time.   
      
   loco in the coco means...cuckoo   
      
   It is where Relativity got it's ...foundation, a cuckoo clock.   
      
   >   
   >This means: the universe has not really an age, because it 'folds back   
   >into itself'.   
   >   
   >This idea is a little tricky, but imagine a Moebius strip. That has only   
   >one side, even if a sheet of paper has two.   
   >   
   >Now place something (like e.g. yourself) upon one side and walk into one   
   >direction, then you would end up upside down below your feet and would   
   >walk into the opposite direction.   
   >   
   >Now think about this phenomenon in 3D.   
   >   
   >...   
   >   
   >TH   
   >   
   >...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)