From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 10:51:45 +0200, Maciej Wo?niak
wrote:
>On 10/9/2025 8:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:32:00 +0200, Thomas Heger
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am Dienstag000007, 07.10.2025 um 10:51 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>>>> Den 07.10.2025 10:05, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>>> Am Sonntag000005, 05.10.2025 um 12:38 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>>>>>> Den 05.10.2025 11:00, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>>>>> Am Samstag000004, 04.10.2025 um 20:39 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>>>>>>>> Den 02.10.2025 09:52, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The universe has actually no time, because time is a LOCAL measure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your local time will always point into the future, but only into
>>>>>>>>> your LOCAL future!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Other observers in other locations have a local future, too, but
>>>>>>>>> that can actually be your past.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are on the Earth and I am on the Moon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you give an example where my local future is yor local past?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (Or vice versa if you prefer.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not, because the distance between Moon and Earth is real valued.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you turn the axis of time upside down, this would be an
>>>>>>> 'imaginary rotation'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This would be a valid timeline, too, but in world, which is made
>>>>>>> from anti-matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Such an 'anti-world' would be perfectly normal, though only for
>>>>>>> anti- beings living there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But we couldn't go there, because contact to anti-matter would make
>>>>>>> us detonate instantly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if my local future were your local past, then the world
>>>>>> would explode?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you would.
>>>>>
>>>> OK.
>>>> Since you are not trying to defend your statement:
>>>>
>>>> "Other observers in other locations have a local future,
>>>> too, but that can actually be your past."
>>>>
>>>> . . you must have realised that it is meaningless nonsense.
>>>
>>> It is an assumption.
>>>
>>> This assumption says, that time is local only.
>>
>> It is not an assumption. Einstein's time is only based on...'local
>> only'...it's caled...Relativity.
>>
>> Einstein's time is local time.
>It IS ans assumption. Einstein's shark is a farm
>animal with thick wool that eats grass and is kept
>for its wool, skin, and meat.
>Similarly to Riemann's straight line - which is
>a circle.
>
>
The only way to draw a straight line is in a circle.
If you walk straight, don't you meet yourself????
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
