Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 223,939 of 225,861    |
|    Paul B. Andersen to All    |
|    Re: The problem of simultaneity    |
|    13 Oct 25 21:59:50    |
      From: relativity@paulba.no              Den 13.10.2025 07:59, skrev Thomas Heger:       >       > I meant that time is always an interval, while Einstein thought about       > time as linear and countable.              So according to Thomas Heger it is impossible to say what       the time is now. :-D              What the display on a 'clock' shows is a 'point in time'.              I can say that the 'time' now is October 13, 2025, 14:34:32 CET       That's 'a point in time'.              If I left my home at t1 = October 13, 2025, 7:05:10 CET       and arrived at work at t2 = October 13, 2025, 7:59:50 CET       Then I can say that the 'time' I used to walk to work today       was 54 minutes and 40 seconds. (Δt = t2 - t1)       That's a duration (or 'interval').              So "time" can be both 'a point in time' and a duration.              > But usually we use some starting point as reference, while often that       > isn't mentioned.              The 'starting point' is obviously 'the point in time' at       the beginning of the duration in question.              If we are only interested in durations, we may choose to       use a clock we can set to zero at any time.                     --       Paul              https://paulba.no/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca