XPost: sci.math
From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:47 +0200, Thomas Heger
wrote:
>Am Dienstag000014, 14.10.2025 um 12:11 schrieb Mikko:
>> On 2025-10-13 05:59:58 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>>
>>> Am Samstag000011, 11.10.2025 um 11:28 schrieb Richard Hachel:
>>>> Le 11/10/2025 à 09:13, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Einstein's relativity theory isn't relativistic at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> TH
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> It's relativistic.
>>>> But the problem is that it confuses everything, and it leads to
>>>> nonsense if you take it a step too far.
>>>> For example, Albert Einstein, who is considered a god, was unable to
>>>> understand the difference between the relativity of chronotropy
>>>> and the relativity of durations, which is what Dr. Richard Hachel,
>>>> who is considered a crank, does.
>>>> It's the history of humanity in real life.
>>>>
>>>> Let's take Langevin's traveler as an example; Hachel is very precise
>>>> about the terms. On the traveler's return, for example, his
>>>> chronotropy beats slower than that of the terrestrial traveler (as on
>>>> the outward journey), but his watch nevertheless runs faster.
>>>
>>>
>>> I would use other words, but actually had the same impression of
>>> Einstein's text.
>>>
>>> I meant that time is always an interval, while Einstein thought about
>>> time as linear and countable.
>>>
>>> But usually we use some starting point as reference, while often that
>>> isn't mentioned.
>>>
>>> What makes no sense, that are terms like 'bestimmte Ära' (certain
>>> era), because eras are not numbered.
>>>
>>> Also this concept of 'linear time' (embedded in 'big-bang theory') is
>>> most likely wrong.
>>>
>>> Einstein also used 'external time', which is similar to Newtons
>>> 'absolute time', while didn't use Poincare's 'local time'.
>>>
>>> So, in my opinion SRT isn't 'relativistic' enough.
>>
>> The problem with the word "time" (and many other words) is that in
>> Common Language it is used for many different meanings. When clearer
>> expression is desired different words should be used for different
>> meanings. Often, and in particular for discussing physics, it is
>> best to restrict the meaning of "time" when used as a nout to
>> expressions that can be used as an answer to the questions that ask
>> when someting happens, i.e., values of a time coordinate of an event.
>> The word "duration" can be used for difference of two times. But even
>> in physics discussions it is usually assumed that the participants can
>> understand from context which of the multiple meanings of "time" is
>> used.
>>
>
>To treat time as a coordinate is a VERY bad idea!
>
>
>This is so, because with 'coordinates' we usually mean positions in space.
>
>But time does not define a position in space.
>
>Actually time values do not define 'positions' in time , neither.
>
>The problem with your assumption is, that you would need to define a
>zero point in time and can't do that.
>
>Actually the so called 'big-bang-theory' was meant to provide just that,
>but is most likely wrong.
>
>Not only did it come from a catholic priest, who wanted to make 1. book
>of Genesis 'scientific', but it's also quite illogic.
>
>Therefore, the (real) universe is not expanding from a certain
>beginning, but a visible subset is.
>
>The 'real universe' is mainly invisible, hence we cannot know, whether
>or not it had a beginning.
>
>At leat we cannot measure the beginning and that would make the use of
>such a startig point in time next to impossible.
>
>
>TH
>
Since I'm the only expert on earth regarding Before the big bang...
the "starting point" can easily be measured.
The stars are the measuring points in space.
Each star is a point in space.
You can start with the big dipper and the little dipper which were
around since the beginning of the big bang, (and before).
How do you measure the starting point? You need to
reverse einginneer all the points in the sky (space).
When you accomplish that...
you will find all the stars evenly
distributed in the form of a ...grid.
grid
/grid/
noun
1.
a framework of spaced bars that are parallel to or cross each other; a
grating.
"the metal grids had been pulled across the foyer"
Similar:
grating
mesh
gauze
grille
grillwork
lattice
framework
network
crisscross
2.
a network of lines that cross each other to form a series of squares
or rectangles.
"a grid of tree-lined streets"
Similar:
the matrix
network
reticulation
reticulum
plexus
decussation
graticule
verb
put into or set out as a grid.
after the big bang
* '*
*
*
*
*
*
before the big bang
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
i appologize if your sciences have not yet caught up with me.
i give yous guys a thousand years to figure it out...
The Starmaker - where stars are made...overnight!
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
