XPost: sci.math   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Sonntag000019, 19.10.2025 um 11:11 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   > 'The Theory of Everything is an overarching hypothetical framework   
   > that would explain the physics of the entire universe in a single   
   > equation. But unifying theories that define the large-scale   
   > cosmological structure of the universe with those that describe the   
   > minuscule quantum world of the subatomic particles has been a   
   > challenge for over a century.'   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > The key word here is... unifying.   
   >   
   > So, if energy is mass, and mass is energy...how come it's not called   
   > energymass? or massenergy??   
   >   
   > I mean, if you want to  unifying..then EM, not e=m.   
   >   
   > or energymass.   
   >   
   > Lets get this TOE started. Get it right!   
   >   
   >   explain the physics of the entire universe in a single equation.   
      
   My proposal for this question was this:   
      
   p' = q* p * q^-1>   
   > Is TOE a single equation of  the entire universe?   
   >   
   >   or an abbreviation?   
   No. The 'entire universe' is actually a misnomer.   
      
   What we call 'universe' is actually a picture, we receive from the past.   
      
   But its not only a picture from the past, but also from different times   
   in the past, which we receive today, even if what is seen doesn't exist   
   any more in most cases.   
      
   So: a complete description of this 'universe' doesn't make much sense to   
   beginn with.   
      
   We could, however, identify certain universal patterns, from which the   
   structures we see could have emerged.   
      
   This wouldn't explain large scale structures by simply equations,   
   because that is impossible anyhow.   
      
   But we could try to identify, what could eventually allow such   
   structures to emerge.   
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)