XPost: sci.math   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Ross Finlayson  wrote:   
      
   > On 10/19/2025 03:21 PM, Michel Pohitonov wrote:   
   > > Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 10/19/2025 01:07 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > >>> It is you who is thoroughly confused.   
   > >>> If there are free parameters in it it isn't the TOE,   
   > >>> by definition, (because it leaves things to be explained) Jan   
   > >>>   
   > >> No, that's just a closed form and physics is an open system.   
   > >> A theory of everything has to have everything in it, ..., itself.   
   > >>   
   > >> All you got there is what you think is a closed calculus.   
   > >> A finite state machine. You've counted to infinity.   
   > >   
   > > you have no brain, and masturbate   
   > >   
   > > calculus, infinite, state machine etc etc and etc, are macro scale domain   
   > > ONLY, which does NOT exists in quantum and above relativity domains   
   > >   
   > > the TOE is an oxymoron, invented by stupid scientists wannabes, wanting to   
   > > appear big   
   > >   
   > > quote less, you fucking stoopid, resume it to what you are replying for   
   > >   
   >   
   > Now that you mention it, I don't top-quote nor cut-context   
   > because each Usenet post is its own little published work,   
   > then any "ToE" by definition is a unique thing, and any   
   > thing that isn't, or is missing anything, by definition isn't.   
      
   There can't be any TOE, only the.   
   If it isn't unique (up to trivial isomorphisms)   
   it isn't the TOE,   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)