XPost: sci.math   
   From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/21/2025 8:40 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 10/21/2025 06:49 PM, sobriquet wrote:   
   >> Op 21-10-2025 om 22:16 schreef J. J. Lodder:   
   >>> Ross Finlayson  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10/19/2025 03:21 PM, Michel Pohitonov wrote:   
   >>>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 10/19/2025 01:07 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   >>>>>>> It is you who is thoroughly confused.   
   >>>>>>> If there are free parameters in it it isn't the TOE,   
   >>>>>>> by definition, (because it leaves things to be explained) Jan   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, that's just a closed form and physics is an open system.   
   >>>>>> A theory of everything has to have everything in it, ..., itself.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> All you got there is what you think is a closed calculus.   
   >>>>>> A finite state machine. You've counted to infinity.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> you have no brain, and masturbate   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> calculus, infinite, state machine etc etc and etc, are macro scale   
   >>>>> domain   
   >>>>> ONLY, which does NOT exists in quantum and above relativity domains   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> the TOE is an oxymoron, invented by stupid scientists wannabes,   
   >>>>> wanting to   
   >>>>> appear big   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> quote less, you fucking stoopid, resume it to what you are replying   
   >>>>> for   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now that you mention it, I don't top-quote nor cut-context   
   >>>> because each Usenet post is its own little published work,   
   >>>> then any "ToE" by definition is a unique thing, and any   
   >>>> thing that isn't, or is missing anything, by definition isn't.   
   >>>   
   >>> There can't be any TOE, only the.   
   >>> If it isn't unique (up to trivial isomorphisms)   
   >>> it isn't the TOE,   
   >>>   
   >>> Jan   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Does that include the multiverse or does each universe in the multiverse   
   >> get its own TOE?   
   >>   
   >   
   > That's just the imagination and unfulfilled contingency,   
   > except the one of them that's "now".   
   >   
   > Not that there's anything wrong with that,   
   > the imagination and unfilled contingency   
   > of all the theories always exists -   
   > just there's exactly one that's actually true.   
   >   
   > According to "realists", ....   
   >   
   >   
      
   ...Turtles all the way up and down... They always were there... There is   
   no chicken and egg problem for this... ;^)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)