XPost: sci.math
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl
sobriquet wrote:
> Op 21-10-2025 om 22:16 schreef J. J. Lodder:
> > Ross Finlayson wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/19/2025 03:21 PM, Michel Pohitonov wrote:
> >>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 10/19/2025 01:07 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >>>>> It is you who is thoroughly confused.
> >>>>> If there are free parameters in it it isn't the TOE,
> >>>>> by definition, (because it leaves things to be explained) Jan
> >>>>>
> >>>> No, that's just a closed form and physics is an open system.
> >>>> A theory of everything has to have everything in it, ..., itself.
> >>>>
> >>>> All you got there is what you think is a closed calculus.
> >>>> A finite state machine. You've counted to infinity.
> >>>
> >>> you have no brain, and masturbate
> >>>
> >>> calculus, infinite, state machine etc etc and etc, are macro scale domain
> >>> ONLY, which does NOT exists in quantum and above relativity domains
> >>>
> >>> the TOE is an oxymoron, invented by stupid scientists wannabes, wanting
to
> >>> appear big
> >>>
> >>> quote less, you fucking stoopid, resume it to what you are replying for
> >>>
> >>
> >> Now that you mention it, I don't top-quote nor cut-context
> >> because each Usenet post is its own little published work,
> >> then any "ToE" by definition is a unique thing, and any
> >> thing that isn't, or is missing anything, by definition isn't.
> >
> > There can't be any TOE, only the.
> > If it isn't unique (up to trivial isomorphisms)
> > it isn't the TOE,
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
> Does that include the multiverse or does each universe in the multiverse
> get its own TOE?
Multiverses with random constants of nature exclude a TOE.
That's why they were invented to begin with,
Jan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
