XPost: sci.math   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Ross Finlayson  wrote:   
      
   > On 10/21/2025 01:16 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > > Ross Finlayson  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 10/19/2025 03:21 PM, Michel Pohitonov wrote:   
   > >>> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 10/19/2025 01:07 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > >>>>> It is you who is thoroughly confused.   
   > >>>>> If there are free parameters in it it isn't the TOE,   
   > >>>>> by definition, (because it leaves things to be explained) Jan   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>> No, that's just a closed form and physics is an open system.   
   > >>>> A theory of everything has to have everything in it, ..., itself.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> All you got there is what you think is a closed calculus.   
   > >>>> A finite state machine. You've counted to infinity.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> you have no brain, and masturbate   
   > >>>   
   > >>> calculus, infinite, state machine etc etc and etc, are macro scale domain   
   > >>> ONLY, which does NOT exists in quantum and above relativity domains   
   > >>>   
   > >>> the TOE is an oxymoron, invented by stupid scientists wannabes, wanting   
   to   
   > >>> appear big   
   > >>>   
   > >>> quote less, you fucking stoopid, resume it to what you are replying for   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> Now that you mention it, I don't top-quote nor cut-context   
   > >> because each Usenet post is its own little published work,   
   > >> then any "ToE" by definition is a unique thing, and any   
   > >> thing that isn't, or is missing anything, by definition isn't.   
   > >   
   > > There can't be any TOE, only the.   
   > > If it isn't unique (up to trivial isomorphisms)   
   > > it isn't the TOE,   
   > >   
   > > Jan   
   > >   
   >   
   >   
   > "In summary, the "Moment and Motion" series proposes a foundational   
   > physics where Moment and Motion are a fundamental, irreducible   
   > dialectic—a perpetual synthesis of the measurable point and the   
   > continuous process. It is a philosophy built to address the failures of   
   > reductionism by positing that the Relation itself is the primary   
   > substance of the universe."   
   >   
   > Of course that's just what you get from pointing a large reasoner   
   > at a very human philosophical development like Ross Finlayson's   
   > "Moment and Motion", which is his brief study into the theory of   
   > motion and mechanics that's so profound it's like he understands it.   
      
   And your reasoned value for \alpha is...?   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)