[continued from previous message]   
      
   > then align anti-reductionism with expansion of comprehension,   
   > which is free.   
   >   
   > So, when you look at somebody like Fritz London, or,   
   > Salam and Weinberg about asymptotic freedom, or,   
   > Alain Aspect or otherwise about neutrinos, examples   
   > of anti-reductionists, is that it's pretty much since   
   > things like Minkowskian space-time that advances in   
   > physics are courtesy it, then that applications   
   > can quietly compute.   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antireductionism   
   >   
   >   
   > Also "realism" is considered sort of necessary.   
   > Now, most people would think "isn't physics all   
   > about the real already", then when they find out   
   > that on the theory side the "nominalists" and   
   > "fictionalists" aren't "realists", and on the   
   > experimental side that "instrumentalists" and   
   > "observationalists" aren't "realists", here it's   
   > that realists can use theory and experiment just fine.   
      
   A catastrophic heap of pompous words, smashed together like a literary   
   landfill, spewing nonsense in every direction.   
      
   An overstuffed, brain‑bending pile of highbrow words, strung together   
   with all the elegance of a drunken squirrel.   
      
   A grotesque mashup of scholarly terms, thrown together like confetti in a   
   hurricane, making zero sense.   
      
   A pretentious word‑salad so jumbled it could make a dictionary weep.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)