XPost: sci.math
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl
Jeronimo Krakowski wrote:
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
> >> >>> (c?d?)? = (c?dt)? ? dx? ? dy? ? dz?
> >> >>> The theory Einstein defined in "On the electrodynamics of moving
> >> >>> bodies" is identical to the theory defined by the metric above.
> >
> > Fine, if you insist,
> > but then rotations in Euclidean space must be 'tensor' too.
> > Too bad Euclid couldn't understand his own geometry.
>
> simply, the LHS equates a change in distance to the RHS another change in
> distance, based on the constancy of the speed of light, assumed constant
> both sides; left side local, right side remote in deep space
Sure just like ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2,
which defines Euclidean geometry nowadays.
> people don't know nor specify; which may, or may not be true
>
> on earth, at same curvature gradient, but not in deep in space, where the
> probability distribution of the particles, otherwise is rare
>
> which also proves the speed inside of a blackhole beats the light, as its
> particles does NOT distributes
>
> A nuclear-driven missile, such as 's 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO designation
> SSC-X-9 Skyfall), is a cruise missile powered by a small nuclear reactor
> instead of conventional chemical fuels. The propulsion system is based on
> a nuclear ramjet design, where air is compressed as it enters the engine,
> then heated by a nuclear reactor instead of burning fuel. This superheated
> air expands and is expelled at high speed to generate thrust, allowing the
> missile to fly for extended durations.
Sure, Richard Feynman held a patent on it, seventy years ago,
but no one has been foolish enough to actually build one,
up to now,
Jan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
