XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:55:21 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Den 27.10.2025 16:36, skrev The Starmaker:   
   >> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:27:06 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Den 26.10.2025 22:27, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:   
   >>>> On 10/26/2025 9:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But the predictions of a logically consistent theory   
   >>>>> do not have to be in accordance with measurements.   
   >>>>> Only real experiments can show that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and this is some bullshit too.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> So according to Maciej Wo?niak the predictions of   
   >>> a logical consistent theory must necessarily be in   
   >>> accordance with measurements.   
   >>>   
   >>> Right?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Some of the experiments testing SR:   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Fizeau_by_Michelson.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1887.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell_II.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Frisch_Smith.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf   
   >>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brillet_Hall.pdf   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece   
   >>>> of lying shit as you are can't lie non   
   >>>> stop, so sometimes you admit that the real   
   >>>> measurement results have little in common   
   >>>> with the delusions of your idiot guru.   
   >>> What I have or haven't said about the experiments above   
   >>> is irrelevant.   
   >>>   
   >>> Are you claiming that all the experimental physicists who performed   
   >>> the experiments above are lying frauds who have faked their results?   
   >>>   
   >>> If you do, you will look very smart.   
   >>   
   >> Yeah! There are ALL lying frauds!! ALL OF THEM!!!   
   >>   
   >> including You!   
   >   
   >You are obviously a very smart guy.   
      
      
   Show me the  experimental physicists and I'll show you the FRAUD!   
      
   Michelson’s analysis of errors in his 1881/87   
   experiments of the two swimmers contest;   
      
   https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2197/1/012012/pdf   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)