4cdb8fe8   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 31.10.2025 07:01, skrev Maciej Woźniak:   
   > On 10/30/2025 10:52 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:   
   >> Den 28.10.2025 23:04, skrev Maciej Woźniak:   
   >>> On 10/28/2025 9:57 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You have stated that you know that the experimental   
   >>>> physicists who performed the experiments above were not   
   >>>> faking the results of their experiments.   
   >>>> So you must accept the results of the experiments.   
   >>>   
   >>> And I do.   
   >>   
   >> ..accept the results of these experiments:>>   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Fizeau_by_Michelson.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1887.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell_II.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Frisch_Smith.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf   
   >> https://paulba.no/paper/Brillet_Hall.pdf   
   >   
   > And I do.   
   > I just don't accept stinking lies of   
   > of fanatic idiots like yourself - that   
   > those results konfirmer somehow the   
   > inconsistent mumble of their insane guru.   
      
   That I am a fanatic idiot uttering stinking lies   
   is irrelevant.   
      
   You have accepted the results of the experiments,   
   and it is an irrefutable fact that those results   
   confirm SR and falsify NM.   
      
   So it is too late to claim that those result do not   
   confirm SR.   
      
      
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you still claim ignorance of the fact that   
   >>>> the experiments confirm SR and falsify NM,   
   >>>> then you demonstrate that you don't understand   
   >>>> the consequences of your own words.   
      
   >>> Sorry, poor trash, it's not any fact, it's just   
   >>> an absurd  delusion of some brainwashed religious   
   >>> maniacs. A brainwashed religious maniac, you see,   
   >>> will  always imagine that everything is confirming   
   >>> the bullshit he believes - just like you do.   
      
   >> Thanks for confirming that you don't understand   
   >> the consequences of your own words:   
      
   >   
   > Fortunately, even such a disgusting   
   > piece of lying shit as you are - can't   
   > lie non stop. The real measurement   
   > results give t'=t, and you sometimes admit   
   > it.   
      
   When cornered, talk about something else, eh? :-D   
      
   I suppose that the "real measurements" you are   
   referring to must be one of the measurement   
   in the experiments below, because you have   
   never made a measurement showing t'=t, have you?   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Fizeau_by_Michelson.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1887.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell_II.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Frisch_Smith.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Brillet_Hall.pdf   
   In which of the experiments is it measured that t'= t ?   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)