From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
On Sat, 08 Nov 2025 19:18:59 -0800, The Starmaker
wrote:
>On Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:12:39 -0800, The Starmaker
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 8 Nov 2025 13:37:43 +0100, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>Lodder) wrote:
>>
>>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:03:07 -0800, The Starmaker
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >While there is a later anecdote describing Einstein as unimpressed
>>>> >about the experimental results, and sure of his theory even in the
>>>> >absence of evidence (stating, when asked what he would have said if
>>>> >the results had been otherwise, "Then I would feel sorry for the dear
>>>> >Lord. The theory is correct anyway.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single
>>>> >experiment can prove me wrong. Albert Einstein
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >Both comments above contradict each other
>>>> >
>>>> >One Einstein sez "a single experiment can prove me wrong. "
>>>> >
>>>> >and the other ", "Then I would feel sorry for the dear Lord. The
>>>> >theory is correct anyway."
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >and *any* experiment that proves him right????
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >i don't get it.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, too much information for yous too follow..
>>>>
>>>> Let's just take One of Einsteins's comments...
>>>>
>>>> "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single
>>>> experiment can prove me wrong." -- Albert Einstein
>>>>
>>>> How many times are those stupid Science News reporters going to
>>>> say Einstein Right Again when Einstein himself said...
>>>>
>>>> "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right;..."????
>>>>
>>>> then you have people here posting
>>>> experiments made by other proving Albert Einstein Right when Einstein
>>>> himself said:
>>>>
>>>> "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right;.."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are these people retarded?
>>>
>>>No, it is you.
>>>
>>>> I cannot find any other explaination for this.
>>>
>>>The explanation is quite simple, really:
>>>Einstein never said any of those things,
>>>
>>>Jan
>>
>>
>>“Induction
>>and Deduction,” December 25, 1919, CPAE, Vol. 7,
>>Doc. 28
>>
>>
>>quote published by those retards at:
>>
>>Copyright © 2011 by Princeton University Press and
>>The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>
>
>"Induction and Deduction" is the English translation of an essay by
>Albert Einstein titled "Induktion und Deduktion in der Physik". It was
>originally published in the German newspaper Berliner Tageblatt on
>December 25, 1919.
>The citation "CPAE, Vol. 7, Doc. 28" refers to this essay as Document
>28 in Volume 7 of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein.
>In the essay, written shortly after his theory of general relativity
>was famously confirmed by eclipse observations, Einstein discusses the
>nature of scientific theory and knowledge. He explains that while
>observation and experience are essential, no amount of experimentation
>can definitively "prove" a theory to be correct because a future
>observation might always contradict its consequences (the principle of
>fallibilism or falsifiability). He argues that scientific theories are
>free inventions of the human mind that are tested against empirical
>facts. The essay has been noted for its resonance with Karl Popper's
>later philosophy of science regarding falsification.
https://reachone01.github.io/%E4%BC%A0%E8%AE%B0/Einstein/Einstei
_split_013.html#filepos357534
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
