Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 224,385 of 225,861    |
|    olcott to Mild Shock    |
|    Re: OpenAI is Toast: Kimi K2 is Live [Ha    |
|    10 Nov 25 12:20:20    |
   
   XPost: sci.math, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/10/2025 8:57 AM, Mild Shock wrote:   
   > Hi,   
   >   
   > Lets analyse Ross Finlaysons Halting Problem   
   > nonsensen with Kimi K2:   
   >   
   > Ross Finlayson schrieb:   
   > > I don't go looking for paradoxes,   
   > > since there aren't any in a real theory,   
   > > contradictions though automatically   
   > > make for counterexamples, then about   
   > > the "analytical bridges",   
   > > or ponts is what I call them,   
   > > not the "invincible ignorance".   
   >   
   > Lets see what Kimi K2 says:   
   >   
   >   
   User: int H(char* P);   
      
   int D()   
   {   
    int Halt_Status = H(D);   
    if (Halt_Status)   
    HERE: goto HERE;   
    return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
   Answer only on the basis of performing the   
   actual simulation of D simulated by H.   
      
   When N statements of D are simulated by H   
   according to the semantics of the C programming   
   language can the simulated D reach its own   
   "return" statement final halt state for any value of N?   
   Kimi: Based on direct simulation of D by H per C semantics:   
      
   **No. For any finite N statements simulated, D cannot reach its return   
   statement.**   
      
   The simulation proceeds:   
   1. H begins simulating D's first statement: `int Halt_Status = H(D);`   
   2. To evaluate this, H must simulate a **recursive call to itself with D   
   as input**   
   3. This creates infinite simulation recursion: H simulating D calling H   
   simulating D calling H...   
   4. The simulation never advances past this first statement to reach the   
   `if (Halt_Status)` test or the `return Halt_Status;` line   
      
   The `goto HERE` infinite loop is irrelevant to the core problem—**the   
   simulation fails to terminate before reaching it**. This is the   
   fundamental self-reference trap: any attempted halt decider H cannot   
   complete its simulation of D because D is constructed to force recursive   
   simulation that never reaches a final state.   
      
   https://www.kimi.com/chat/19a6efaf-e1e2-84da-8000-09a1e69a2313   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca