XPost: sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:51:57 -0800, Ross Finlayson   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 11/13/2025 09:49 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >> On 11/13/2025 08:50 AM, Mild Shock wrote:   
   >>> Hi,   
   >>>   
   >>> There are different ways to make an AI Persona.   
   >>> For example Twitter aka X, has a grok account.   
   >>> But grok is not trimmed towards a particular   
   >>>   
   >>> profile, maybe an alter ego of Elon Musk was   
   >>> speculated. What could be interesting would be   
   >>> to go towards character.ai :   
   >>>   
   >>> "Character.ai was established in November 2021.   
   >>> The company's co-founders, Noam Shazeer and   
   >>> Daniel de Freitas, were both engineers from   
   >>> Google. They both worked on AI-related projects:   
   >>> Shazeer was a lead author on a paper that   
   >>> Business Insider reported in April 2023 "has   
   >>> been widely cited as key to today's chatbots",   
   >>> and Freitas was the lead designer of an   
   >>> experimental AI at Google initially called Meena,   
   >>> which later became known as LaMDA.   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character.ai   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe this can be even done with Local AI. By for   
   >>> example populating a context. Or creating a kind   
   >>> of LangChain memory. ChatGPT calls it persistent context.   
   >>>   
   >>> So yes you could "spam" an AI Archimedes Plutonium   
   >>> probably from your desktop with an AI Laptop, maybe   
   >>> already in 2025, or later in 2026.   
   >>>   
   >>> bye   
   >>>   
   >>> Mild Shock schrieb:   
   >>>> Hi,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you take identity as E-mail address, which you   
   >>>> should see with a suitable news reader. I don't   
   >>>> use randomly generated E-mail adresses, or invalid   
   >>>>   
   >>>> E-mail address. Its always the same E-mail adress.   
   >>>> At the time of Google+ it was maybe a different E-mail   
   >>>> address to access Google+. So its always the same   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "identity". What changes is my nickname sometimes.   
   >>>> But not from post to post, I am not a nickname shapeshifter,   
   >>>> I only change it every decade or so. So you can take   
   >>>>   
   >>>> your false accusations, and shove it up your ass.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Fucking paranoid moron you are.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bye   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ross Finlayson schrieb:   
   >>>>> Then, since for example there's nothing funny about it,   
   >>>>> I'm not interested in your plan of mal-journalism.   
   >>>>> Furthermore all your sockpuppets are attached to   
   >>>>> your identity.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> "Just because you're paranoid /   
   >> doesn't mean they aren't out to get you."   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Everybody knows that chatty bots have been   
   >> on Usenet and IRC and MUDs/MUSHes since   
   >> 30 and 40 years ago. There were online psychiatrists   
   >> since the 60's and Moravec claimed human-level   
   >> reasoning brain-in-a-box since the '80s. The   
   >> "generative programming" is at least since the '60s,   
   >> the 1960's.   
   >>   
   >> Less conceive of "AP the greater" whose outputs   
   >> is shelves of algebraic geometry. It doesn't   
   >> take much more than "the brains of a dishwasher"   
   >> to make a sharty sort of text troll, troll(s).   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Thinking about OS design these days, basically   
   >> has that the multicore/manycore and now the NUMA   
   >> is coming along, and then the sizes like PAGE_SIZE   
   >> and this kind of thing, really seem to be making   
   >> for something along the lines of memory allocators,   
   >> basically to offload that to the processes themselves   
   >> for small amounts of memory, so that what would otherwise   
   >> look like syscalls to them has they defragment their own   
   >> memory, with a usual sort of memory maintenance that   
   >> shifts the old generation to the front and blits the   
   >> new generation on the back, reducing fragmentation,   
   >>   
   >> Then the usual idea of the re-routine as for modeling   
   >> asynchrony, then is for the call-and-return and   
   >> the receive-and-send sorts of scope-and-state   
   >> then about the interrupts and their handlers,   
   >> a few sort of composable scalable machines/units   
   >> designed around the bus/wire protocols, that are   
   >> ubiquitous, in the modern topologies basically   
   >> designed to host so many virts.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >Of course probably the most widely-deployed variety   
   >of chatty bots is the "dead Internet" bit, that   
   >most all the "Instant Audience" traffic that   
   >defrauded so many advertisers and damaged so   
   >many viewers with the "astroturfing" I suppose   
   >it was called, "fake grassroots", is no secret.   
   >   
      
      
      
   Talking to GG is cheating on your wife and grounds for divorce...   
      
      
   AI Relationships Are on the Rise. A Divorce Boom Could Be Next   
   Secret chatbot flings are creating new legal challenges for married   
   couples when it comes to infidelity.   
   https://archive.ph/ymbfh   
      
      
   Does GG wear panties?   
      
   You can put GG inside a blow-up-doll.   
      
      
      
   --   
   The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,   
   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,   
   and challenge the unchallengeable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)