home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.relativity      The theory of relativity      225,861 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 224,649 of 225,861   
   Paul.B.Andersen to All   
   Re: No amount of experimentation can eve   
   15 Nov 25 21:09:24   
   
   XPost: sci.math   
   From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 15.11.2025 16:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak:   
   > On 11/15/2025 3:27 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Why are you responding to a post when you address nothing in it?   
   >>   
   >> Try again?   
   >> Or are you admitting that the following is beyond your abilities?   
   >>   
   >> -------   
   >>   
   >> In SR/GR "proper acceleration" is the acceleration measured   
   >> in the rest frame (Momentarily co-moving inertial frame).   
   >> So there is no velocity to derivate, and the proper acceleration > is as   
   explained below.   
   >>   
   >> According to GR the proper acceleration of the satellite   
   >> is a = F/m where m is the mass of the satellite and F is the force   
   >> acting on it. Since no force is acting on an object in free-fall,   
   >> the proper acceleration of the satellite is zero.   
   >>   
   >> According to GR the proper acceleration of an object on the ground   
   >> is 9.81 m/s² upwards.   
   >>   
   >> In GR, the acceleration is what an accelerometer shows.   
   >> An accelerometer in free-fall  will show zero acceleration,   
   >> an accelerometer on the ground will show 9.81 m/s² acceleration   
   >> upwards.   
   >>   
   >> Why do you think accelerometers show what GR says,   
   >> and not what your common sense say it should show?   
   >>   
   >> Could it be that GR is more in accordance with   
   >> the laws of nature than is your prejudiced common sense?   
      
   I see.   
   This was way beyond your mental abilities,   
   so all you can do is to babble nonsense like this:   
   > Sure, and in a theory of sharks eating grass   
   > a shark is what eats grass.   
      
   I will give an advise.   
   If a post is above your mental abilities,   
   and you understand nothing - don't respond.   
      
   Babbling nonsense will only make you look stupid.   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca