Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 224,649 of 225,861    |
|    Paul.B.Andersen to All    |
|    Re: No amount of experimentation can eve    |
|    15 Nov 25 21:09:24    |
      XPost: sci.math       From: relativity@paulba.no              Den 15.11.2025 16:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak:       > On 11/15/2025 3:27 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:       >>       >> Why are you responding to a post when you address nothing in it?       >>       >> Try again?       >> Or are you admitting that the following is beyond your abilities?       >>       >> -------       >>       >> In SR/GR "proper acceleration" is the acceleration measured       >> in the rest frame (Momentarily co-moving inertial frame).       >> So there is no velocity to derivate, and the proper acceleration > is as       explained below.       >>       >> According to GR the proper acceleration of the satellite       >> is a = F/m where m is the mass of the satellite and F is the force       >> acting on it. Since no force is acting on an object in free-fall,       >> the proper acceleration of the satellite is zero.       >>       >> According to GR the proper acceleration of an object on the ground       >> is 9.81 m/s² upwards.       >>       >> In GR, the acceleration is what an accelerometer shows.       >> An accelerometer in free-fall will show zero acceleration,       >> an accelerometer on the ground will show 9.81 m/s² acceleration       >> upwards.       >>       >> Why do you think accelerometers show what GR says,       >> and not what your common sense say it should show?       >>       >> Could it be that GR is more in accordance with       >> the laws of nature than is your prejudiced common sense?              I see.       This was way beyond your mental abilities,       so all you can do is to babble nonsense like this:       > Sure, and in a theory of sharks eating grass       > a shark is what eats grass.              I will give an advise.       If a post is above your mental abilities,       and you understand nothing - don't respond.              Babbling nonsense will only make you look stupid.              --       Paul              https://paulba.no/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca