Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 224,655 of 225,861    |
|    Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
|    Ross Finlayson would be a good mathemati    |
|    16 Nov 25 01:56:02    |
      XPost: sci.logic, sci.math       From: janburse@fastmail.fm              Hi,              Rossy Boy, can you do this, its from my logic teacher:              The theory BON(µ) + (B-IN) is particularly interesting       in connection with Feferman's philosophical analysis of       Weyl's Das Kontinuum and his reconstruction of the axiom       system of Das Kontinuum in modern terms; see Feferman       [16, 17]. One of his key results is that Weyl's approach       can be developed within a conservative extension of PA.       This system W can be easily reduced to BON(µ) +(B-IN).       https://home.inf.unibe.ch/ltg/publications/2018/jae18.pdf              But now I am confused , didn't bang Weyl his head       on MVT? The modulus problem. So whats the scope of W?                     Bye              BTW: Shitty new Microsoft Snipping tool OCR cannot       recognize Greek, had to manually insert µ.              Ross Finlayson schrieb:       > nuclear-force (micro, quantum spikes/wells) not via discrete       > Planck-scale foam, but through axiomless geometry's "sweep"       > (Natural/Unit Equivalency Function), where singularities are       > non-Cartesian transitions preserving constancy/consistency.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca