From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 22.11.2025 09:50, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   > Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 04:28 schrieb Python:   
   >> Le 21/11/2025 à 11:40, Thomas Heger a écrit :   
   >>> Am Dienstag000018, 18.11.2025 um 21:39 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >>> ...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise   
   >>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>   
   >>> Again: you are a hopeless case!   
   >>   
   >> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper   
   >> on SR.   
   >   
   > I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every   
   > single word or equation in it.   
   >   
   > I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could   
   > ask me everthing about it.   
   OK.   
      
   Q1:   
   Have you understood that the Special Theory of Physics (SR)   
   can be summarised in the Lorentz transform (LT)?   
      
   Given two frames of references: K(t,x,y,z) and K'(t',x',y',z')   
   The axes are parallel, x with x', y with y' etc.   
   The origin of K' is moving along the positive x-axis with   
   the speed v.   
      
      c = the speed of light, γ = 1/√(1 − v²/c²)   
      
      t' = γ⋅(t - v⋅x/c²)   
      x' = γ⋅(x - v⋅t)   
      y' = y   
      z' = z   
      
      t = γ⋅(t' + v⋅x'/c²)   
      x = γ⋅(x' + v⋅t')   
      y = y'   
      z = z'   
      
   Q2:   
   Have you understood that the LT and thus SR is logically consistent?   
      
   Q4:   
   Have you understood that all predictions of SR can be derived from   
   the LT?   
      
   Q5:   
   Have you understood that a lot of those prediction are confirmed   
   to be in accordance with measurements in the real world?   
      
   Some tests of SR:   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Fizeau_by_Michelson.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1887.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_Gale_I.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_Gale_II.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell_II.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf   
      
   Facts:   
   "The Special Theory of Relativity (SR)" as defined in Einstein's   
     paper "ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES" is a logically   
     consistent theory which make precise predictions for what will   
     be measured in the real world, and many of these predictions   
     are proved to be in accordance with the measurements, and no   
     prediction of SR is proven wrong.   
      
   Q6:   
   Do you understand that these facts make it rather stupid to claim   
   that the theory defined in Einstein's paper is "terrible crap"?   
      
   >   
   > Unfortunately this is only one paper, which I have analyzed that carefully.   
   >   
   > But still I think, that this text is just terrible crap.   
   >   
   > It is filled with errors of all kinds.   
   >   
   > Some of these errors are also extremely stupid.   
      
   Q7:   
   Which argument of yours are you referring to when you say:   
      
   > And most of my arguments are hard to reject, if you don't want to makle a   
   fool out of yourself.   
      
   ?   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)