11ee5253   
   From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 21.11.2025 20:22, skrev Maciej Woźniak:   
   > On 11/21/2025 8:15 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Consider the following:   
   >>   
   >> The orbital time of a GPS satellite is half a sidereal day,   
   >> that is 43082.045250000 s measured by a clock on the geoid.   
   >>   
   >> GR predicts that the orbital time measured by a clock in   
   >> the GPS satellite will be:   
   >>   43082.045250000⋅(1 + 4.4647e-10) s = 43082.045269235 s,   
   >>   that is 19.235 μs more than measured on the ground.   
   >>   
   >> See:   
   >> https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf   
   >>   
   >> This prediction is confirmed by real measurement   
   >> in the real world:   
      
   >   
   > Fortunately - even such a disgusting piece of   
   > lying shit as you are can't lie non stop, so   
   > sometimes you admit: the real measurement result is   
   > 43082.045250000 and you're only imagining that   
   > it is  43082.045269235 s.   
   >   
      
   The real measurement result was 43082.045269065 s.   
      
   See:   
   https://paulba.no/paper/Initial_results_of_GPS_satellite_1977.pdf   
      
   In the test of the first GPS satellite in 1977 the clock in the   
   satellite  was initially not adjusted down.   
      
   The rate of the clock in the satellite was during  6 days measured   
   to be (1 + 4.425e-10) faster than the clock on the ground.   
   See fig. 20.   
      
   That's 19.064 μs more per orbit than the clock on the ground.   
   This is slightly less than the 19.235 μs predicted by GR,   
   but it is as can be expected by the precision of the atomic clock   
   in the satellite, which was in the order of 1e-12.   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)