XPost: sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:05:01 -0800, The Starmaker   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions   
   >>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this?   
   >>>>>>>>> ====================   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that   
   >>>>>>>> model attempts to model.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would  conduct   
   >>>>>>>> something extremely stupid.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise   
   >>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper on   
   SR.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every   
   >>>> single word or equation in it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could   
   >>>> ask me everthing about it.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote?   
   >>   
   >>Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress.   
   >>   
   >>Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant.   
   >>   
   >>His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter.   
   >>   
   >>But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written.   
   >>   
   >>TH   
   >   
   >She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know   
   >that???   
   >   
   >Dr. Walker also presented evidence at the symposium that a noted   
   >Russian physicist named Abraham F. Joffe had seen the original   
   >manuscripts of Einstein's 1905 papers while Dr. Joffe had been a   
   >graduate student, and that one of the authors on the papers was   
   >``Einstein-Marity,'' the Hungarianized spelling of Mari'c's name.   
      
    Historians have translated the letters between Einstein and Maric   
   into English, allowing a detailed analysis of their relationship.   
   However, one of these letters includes the phrase: “bringing our work   
   on relative motion to a successful conclusion!” This seems to back up   
   the idea that the pair must have collaborated.   
      
    “bringing our work on relative motion to a successful conclusion!”   
      
      
   "our work"   
      
   The 1905 Relativity paper is  “bringing our work on relative motion to   
   a successful conclusion!”   
      
   Maybe she did the math part. (his math was noo too good) pardon my   
   german.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)