XPost: sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:12:43 -0800, The Starmaker   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:05:01 -0800, The Starmaker   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger    
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions   
   >>>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this?   
   >>>>>>>>>> ====================   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that   
   >>>>>>>>> model attempts to model.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would  conduct   
   >>>>>>>>> something extremely stupid.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise   
   >>>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper on   
   SR.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every   
   >>>>> single word or equation in it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could   
   >>>>> ask me everthing about it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote?   
   >>>   
   >>>Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress.   
   >>>   
   >>>Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant.   
   >>>   
   >>>His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter.   
   >>>   
   >>>But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written.   
   >>>   
   >>>TH   
   >>   
   >>She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know   
   >>that???   
   >>   
   >>Dr. Walker also presented evidence at the symposium that a noted   
   >>Russian physicist named Abraham F. Joffe had seen the original   
   >>manuscripts of Einstein's 1905 papers while Dr. Joffe had been a   
   >>graduate student, and that one of the authors on the papers was   
   >>``Einstein-Marity,'' the Hungarianized spelling of Mari'c's name.   
   >   
   > Historians have translated the letters between Einstein and Maric   
   >into English, allowing a detailed analysis of their relationship.   
   >However, one of these letters includes the phrase: “bringing our work   
   >on relative motion to a successful conclusion!” This seems to back up   
   >the idea that the pair must have collaborated.   
   >   
   > “bringing our work on relative motion to a successful conclusion!”   
   >   
   >   
   >"our work"   
   >   
   >The 1905 Relativity paper is  “bringing our work on relative motion to   
   >a successful conclusion!”   
   >   
   >Maybe she did the math part. (his math was noo too good) pardon my   
   >german.   
      
   Maric and Einstein divorced in 1919, but as part of the divorce   
   settlement, Einstein agreed to pay his ex-wife every krona of any   
   future Nobel Prize he might be awarded.   
      
   He told her, "I'll pay you if you promise to shut the fuck up about   
   you co-authored our 1905 paper, ...bitch."   
      
   She said, "Okay you fucking kike!"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)