XPost: sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:16:55 -0800, The Starmaker   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:12:43 -0800, The Starmaker   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 11:05:01 -0800, The Starmaker   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions   
   >>>>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this?   
   >>>>>>>>>>> ====================   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that   
   >>>>>>>>>> model attempts to model.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would  conduct   
   >>>>>>>>>> something extremely stupid.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise   
   >>>>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper   
   on SR.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every   
   >>>>>> single word or equation in it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could   
   >>>>>> ask me everthing about it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>TH   
   >>>   
   >>>She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know   
   >>>that???   
   >>>   
   >>>Dr. Walker also presented evidence at the symposium that a noted   
   >>>Russian physicist named Abraham F. Joffe had seen the original   
   >>>manuscripts of Einstein's 1905 papers while Dr. Joffe had been a   
   >>>graduate student, and that one of the authors on the papers was   
   >>>``Einstein-Marity,'' the Hungarianized spelling of Mari'c's name.   
   >>   
   >> Historians have translated the letters between Einstein and Maric   
   >>into English, allowing a detailed analysis of their relationship.   
   >>However, one of these letters includes the phrase: “bringing our work   
   >>on relative motion to a successful conclusion!” This seems to back up   
   >>the idea that the pair must have collaborated.   
   >>   
   >> “bringing our work on relative motion to a successful conclusion!”   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"our work"   
   >>   
   >>The 1905 Relativity paper is  “bringing our work on relative motion to   
   >>a successful conclusion!”   
   >>   
   >>Maybe she did the math part. (his math was noo too good) pardon my   
   >>german.   
   >   
   >Maric and Einstein divorced in 1919, but as part of the divorce   
   >settlement, Einstein agreed to pay his ex-wife every krona of any   
   >future Nobel Prize he might be awarded.   
   >   
   >He told her, "I'll pay you if you promise to shut the fuck up about   
   >you co-authored our 1905 paper, ...bitch."   
   >   
   >She said, "Okay you fucking kike!"   
      
      
   Here is a list of Einstien's conditions for divorce:   
      
   CONDITIONS   
      
   A. You will make sure:   
      
   1. that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order;   
   2. that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room;   
   3. that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my   
   desk is left for my use only.   
      
   B. You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they   
   are not completely necessary for social reasons. Specifically, You   
   will forego:   
      
   1. my sitting at home with you;   
   2. my going out or travelling with you.   
      
   C. You will obey the following points in your relations with me:   
      
   1. you will not expect any intimacy from me, nor will you reproach me   
   in any way;   
   2. you will stop talking to me if I request it;   
   3. you will leave my bedroom or study immediately without protest if I   
   request it.   
      
   D. You will undertake not to belittle me in front of our children,   
   either through words or behavior.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)