From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Sonntag000023, 23.11.2025 um 20:05 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   > On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions   
   >>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this?   
   >>>>>>>>> ====================   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that   
   >>>>>>>> model attempts to model.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would  conduct   
   >>>>>>>> something extremely stupid.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise   
   >>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper on   
   SR.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every   
   >>>> single word or equation in it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could   
   >>>> ask me everthing about it.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote?   
   >>   
   >> Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress.   
   >>   
   >> Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant.   
   >>   
   >> His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter.   
   >>   
   >> But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written.   
   >>   
   >> TH   
   >   
   > She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know   
   > that???   
   >   
      
   I knew, of course, that Mileva Maric wrote some parts of that article.   
      
   But actually I don't know, which parts she wrote.   
      
   I personally thought, that Einstein didn't write any of those papers or   
   articles, which bear his name.   
      
   The reason to think so:   
      
   Einstein wrote simply way too much in 1905 to be technically possible   
   for a single person.   
      
   He wrote actually four groundbraking articles in 1905 alone, from which   
   one won him a Nobel Price.   
      
   Besides of that and working fulltime at the Swiss patent office in Bern,   
   he also wrote 20 reviews for 'Annalen der Physik'.   
      
   That's more than a person could possibly do, even if he had no familily   
   to care for (as Einstein had).   
      
   So, my guess: 'Q' provided the papers and Einstein his smile.   
      
      
   TH   
      
   > Dr. Walker also presented evidence at the symposium that a noted   
   > Russian physicist named Abraham F. Joffe had seen the original   
   > manuscripts of Einstein's 1905 papers while Dr. Joffe had been a   
   > graduate student, and that one of the authors on the papers was   
   > ``Einstein-Marity,'' the Hungarianized spelling of Mari'c's name.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)