Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 224,929 of 225,861    |
|    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to Paul B. Andersen    |
|    Re: Time is what clocks indicate    |
|    25 Nov 25 01:06:50    |
      XPost: sci.math       From: PointedEars@web.de              Paul B. Andersen wrote:       > Den 24.11.2025 00:36, skrev Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:       >> Paul B. Andersen wrote:       >>> Den 22.11.2025 20:19, skrev Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:       >>>> Scot Deyanov wrote:       >>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:       >>>>>> A manipulated clock is not a clock.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> When we say that time is what is measured with a clock we mean a device       >>>>>> that is not manipulated, that merely follows Nature.       >>>>> no shit sherlock, once that manipulation is done, that clock is a clock       >>>>> like everybody clock       >>>> Which part of "_not_ manipulated" did you not understand?       >>>       >>> It is however common to call the manipulated clock       >>> in a GPS satellite - a clock.       >>       >> The satellite's clock is not manipulated; never has been.       >       > The statement in Maciej Woźniak's idiotic post you responded       > to was: "it's a matter of how we decide to adjust clocks"       >       > The adjustment he referred to was that the rate of       > a GPS SV clock is adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10) compared       > to a clock which is running at the rate defined by SI.              Doubtful. I doubt that he has even understood the basics of how GPS works,       given his constant clueless babbling of "t' = t".              > Your response was: "A manipulated clock is not a clock."       >       > I interpreted that to mean that you called the adjustment       > of the SV clock rate a "manipulation".       >       > But OK, I accept that you don't call this adjustment a "manipulation":       >       > But what kind of manipulation of a clock makes it cease to be a clock?              When it ceases to measure a (proper) time. For example, even the modified       GPS clocks still measure a (proper) time, just not the proper time where       they are because that turns out to be impractical (due to GR effects); they       measure something close to the proper time on the ground instead.              IOW: A clock is no longer a clock if someone or something manipulates it       *while it is in operation* (or when it ceases to operate properly). (I       repeat: This does NOT happen with the atomic clocks aboard GNSS satellites.)              --       PointedEars              Twitter: @PointedEars2       Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca