XPost: sci.math
From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:21:33 +0100, Thomas Heger
wrote:
>Am Sonntag000023, 23.11.2025 um 20:05 schrieb The Starmaker:
>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions
>>>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this?
>>>>>>>>>> ====================
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that
>>>>>>>>> model attempts to model.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would conduct
>>>>>>>>> something extremely stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise
>>>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper on
SR.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every
>>>>> single word or equation in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could
>>>>> ask me everthing about it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote?
>>>
>>> Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress.
>>>
>>> Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant.
>>>
>>> His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter.
>>>
>>> But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written.
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>> She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know
>> that???
>>
>
>I knew, of course, that Mileva Maric wrote some parts of that article.
>
>But actually I don't know, which parts she wrote.
It's very simple...he is a word person, she is a number person.
>
>I personally thought, that Einstein didn't write any of those papers or
>articles, which bear his name.
>
>The reason to think so:
>
>Einstein wrote simply way too much in 1905 to be technically possible
>for a single person.
>
>He wrote actually four groundbraking articles in 1905 alone, from which
>one won him a Nobel Price.
>
>Besides of that and working fulltime at the Swiss patent office in Bern,
>he also wrote 20 reviews for 'Annalen der Physik'.
goofing off fulltime at the Swiss patent office...
he's a goof off.
>
>That's more than a person could possibly do, even if he had no familily
>to care for (as Einstein had).
>
>So, my guess: 'Q' provided the papers and Einstein his smile.
I don't recal Einstein smiling...
>
>
>TH
>
>> Dr. Walker also presented evidence at the symposium that a noted
>> Russian physicist named Abraham F. Joffe had seen the original
>> manuscripts of Einstein's 1905 papers while Dr. Joffe had been a
>> graduate student, and that one of the authors on the papers was
>> ``Einstein-Marity,'' the Hungarianized spelling of Mari'c's name.
I get it. Jewish woman even today in Israel are not allowed to sit in
front of the bus..men sit in front, women sit in the back...where they
belong.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
