Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 225,093 of 225,861    |
|    Ross Finlayson to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    |
|    Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System     |
|    08 Dec 25 12:29:09    |
      [continued from previous message]              approximation and making for triangle inequality and       for Lorentzians and all usually enough tensors too       and about Green and Stokes and Euler and Cauchy,       you all and Gauss have been sitting a bit too easy       since the theory of harmonic functions their series       is insufficient to complete itself with regards to       potentialistic theory, potential theory, and the       theory of potentials".                            Anti-Reductionism and Realism              So anyways, here it's a very _realist_ position and       necessarily thusly an anti-reductionism, to a point,       then that there is a very _large_ space making an algebra       with _all the symmetries great and small_, an orbifold,       sort of like how the geodesy has _all the tensors of       whatever_, so, "classical in the limit", why it's so       possible to describe a comprehensive diagram of the       geodesy for its usual interpretation: as an orbifold,       if though "algebra" is a bit let out.                     Which it is, ....                     So, 1, 2, 3, geodesics (world-lines) in the geodesy       are straight, and each point in the geodesy has only those,       which is about it being a continuous manifold so equipped       and about it being a vector field so equipped, as is well       the orbifold, which it also is, this "trajectifold",       which is a word I made up.              Reductionism and forgetting its words and banning others',       it's a great practical approach about ideals and the practical,       yet, the infinite and completions are still an ideal, since       it's still a continuous manifold, and about gauge theory and       the real or R-gauge eveywhere, and still all in 3 + 1/2       dimensions the space, somehow must be so, reductionism at work.                     Thanks then for quoting the Wiki about the geodesic,       about the geodesy, helping point out that tensors of the       geodesy are about as loose as these algebras their symmetries       of the orbifold, or "The Orbifold" for "The Space-Time",       then, I suppose it would be more clear "The Orbifold" as       much as talking about "The Space-Time", vis-a-vis "the       orbifold" and "the space-time".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca