home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.relativity      The theory of relativity      225,861 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 225,093 of 225,861   
   Ross Finlayson to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   
   Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System    
   08 Dec 25 12:29:09   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   approximation and making for triangle inequality and   
   for Lorentzians and all usually enough tensors too   
   and about Green and Stokes and Euler and Cauchy,   
   you all and Gauss have been sitting a bit too easy   
   since the theory of harmonic functions their series   
   is insufficient to complete itself with regards to   
   potentialistic theory, potential theory, and the   
   theory of potentials".   
      
      
      
   Anti-Reductionism and Realism   
      
   So anyways, here it's a very _realist_ position and   
   necessarily thusly an anti-reductionism, to a point,   
   then that there is a very _large_ space making an algebra   
   with _all the symmetries great and small_, an orbifold,   
   sort of like how the geodesy has _all the tensors of   
   whatever_, so, "classical in the limit", why it's so   
   possible to describe a comprehensive diagram of the   
   geodesy for its usual interpretation: as an orbifold,   
   if though "algebra" is a bit let out.   
      
      
   Which it is, ....   
      
      
   So, 1, 2, 3, geodesics (world-lines) in the geodesy   
   are straight, and each point in the geodesy has only those,   
   which is about it being a continuous manifold so equipped   
   and about it being a vector field so equipped, as is well   
   the orbifold, which it also is, this "trajectifold",   
   which is a word I made up.   
      
   Reductionism and forgetting its words and banning others',   
   it's a great practical approach about ideals and the practical,   
   yet, the infinite and completions are still an ideal, since   
   it's still a continuous manifold, and about gauge theory and   
   the real or R-gauge eveywhere, and still all in 3 + 1/2   
   dimensions the space, somehow must be so, reductionism at work.   
      
      
   Thanks then for quoting the Wiki about the geodesic,   
   about the geodesy, helping point out that tensors of the   
   geodesy are about as loose as these algebras their symmetries   
   of the orbifold, or "The Orbifold" for "The Space-Time",   
   then, I suppose it would be more clear "The Orbifold" as   
   much as talking about "The Space-Time", vis-a-vis "the   
   orbifold" and "the space-time".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca