[continued from previous message]   
      
   > space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational, has at least   
   > that the electron-physics has long known that just like kinetics is   
   > different from kinematics that electro-statics and electro-dynamics are   
   > different than light and different than nuclear radiation, about mass   
   > and charge and the light-like, where visual light is special.   
   > (Electron-physics, hadron-physics, muon-physics, neutrino-physics:   
   > continuum mechanics.)   
   >   
   >   
   > Yeah, a Fitzgeraldian Lorentzian space-contraction then for the   
   > space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational, has   
   > that even in ye olde Galilean that there's heft and otherwise   
   > getting up to explain the Magnus effect when the "heft" after   
   > momentum, which is sort of poorly defined, that classical mechanics   
   > itself needs better "Newton's Zero-eth laws", sort of a "zero-aether   
   > law", in as regards to why classical mechanics itself is rather unfinished.   
   >   
   >   
   > The wave model as a model of change in open systems is really   
   > rather de rigeur, and that it's both energy AND entelechy involved,   
   > makes for why it's continuum laws instead of conservation laws,   
   > and continuum mechanics instead of quantum mechanics.   
   >   
   > Then your Fourth Dimension bit has that, well, first of all,   
   > if space-time is curving then something has to curve it, and,   
   > it's very well verified that it isn't not so that the geodesy   
   > is always current everywhere.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > Maybe you should look more at classical mechanics and heft   
   > instead of not having causality in the universe you'd hope   
   > you'd have a theory of.   
   >   
   > Time is best understood as a linear continuum.   
   >   
   >   
   > So, uh, meters per second, or seconds per meter?   
   > And, any actual change in change in change in ...   
   > is always "infinitely-many nominally-nonzero   
   > higher orders of acceleration"? Yeah, I know,   
   > it requires super-classical accounts of mathematics.   
   > Yet, these may be defined, and relayed.   
   >   
   >   
   > Geometry is Motion / Worlds Turn   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)