From: PointedEars@web.de   
      
   Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 12/08/2025 08:33 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   >> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>> So, "orbits" for "trajectories", is the ideas that since the   
   >>> geodesy always is instantaneously evaluated everywhere, it's   
   >>> no different than "orbits" the trajectories, [...]   
   >>   
   >> Word salad, not even wrong.   
   >   
   > It is so, what I say.   
      
   No, it is not.  You have no clue what you are talking about.   
      
   > The Lepton and Strong Nuclear Force   
      
   Leptons do not interact via the strong interaction as none of them has color   
   charge.  Standard Model 101.   
      
   Why are you changing the topic completely?  Are you embarrassed about your   
   previous blunders?   
    > It remind me of a conversation we had some years ago.   
   > I was like "the leptonic of the photonic" and you were   
   > like "that's not a lepton" and I was like "really, I   
   > mean lepton", and then we talked about Majorana and multi-pole. [...]   
      
   We never had such a discussion.  But I can tell you now that photons are not   
   leptons, and that "the leptonic of the photonic" is *meaningless nonsense*.   
      
   Do you have some mental illness that prevents you from using words properly?   
    Or is it a foreign language issue (then why do you write in a language that   
   you obviously do not understand?)?   
      
   --   
   PointedEars   
      
   Twitter: @PointedEars2   
   Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)