From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Mittwoch000017, 17.12.2025 um 07:26 schrieb Ross Finlayson:   
   > On 12/16/2025 07:57 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   >> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>> On 12/16/2025 11:24 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   >>>> [full quote of something about _photons_]   
   >>>   
   >>> [pseudo-scientific rambling about electrons]   
   >>   
   >> Hopeless case.   
   >>   
   >   
   > It's not hopeless - instead it's a great opportunity,   
   > since great theorists since Faraday and for FitzGerald   
   > then about Heaviside and at least three different ways   
   > of looking at things that got combined in Maxwell's   
   > equations E x B or D x H, which are also at least two   
   > ways of looking at things, then for Faraday and Helmholtz   
   > about that electrical fields the movements within them   
   > are as spirals while they are as waves, then after   
   > Young and Millikan and e/m the charge/mass ratio,   
   > there's Richardson with the electron theory of matter,   
   > establishing at least three constants 'c', all that is   
   > 100-200 years old, thus at least over-ripe for revisiting.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > These days all these particles also have their "-inos",   
   > to get helping to explain for Aspect/Bell type experiments   
   > which has essentially superluminal flux, or at least   
   > reverse flux, that such researches have earned Nobel   
   > prizes even in the last 20-30 years.   
   >   
   >   
      
   My idea about the electron:   
      
   'electron' is only an aspect of a standing wave.   
      
   That aspect denotes the outer edge of a standing rotation wave, while   
   the inner turnig point is commonly called 'proton'.   
      
   So, electrons are not seperate entities but kind of parts of a united   
   structure.   
      
   The minus of the electron's charge denotes 'invards', while the plus of   
   the proton 'outwards'.   
      
   The most simple atom is hydrogen and that is just one single standing   
   wave, where the outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning   
   point 'proton'.   
      
   The wave itself is actually a little tricky and called 'standing   
   rotation wave' for some reasons, which I have described in my 'book',   
   that can be found here:   
      
      
   https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wT   
   xBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing   
      
      
   The idea is called 'structured spacetime' and 'timelike stable patterns'   
   are, what we call 'matter'.   
      
   But 'not timelike stable' is also possible for material object. In that   
   case we call them 'radiation'.   
      
   IOW: a stationary electron is part of an atom, while a non stationary   
   electron is what we call 'photon'.   
      
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)