Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 225,228 of 225,861    |
|    Thomas Heger to All    |
|    Re: Fwd: Einstein's God (a cosmic religi    |
|    02 Jan 26 10:33:57    |
      XPost: sci.physics       From: ttt_heg@web.de              Am Donnerstag000001, 01.01.2026 um 14:30 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:       > Den 01.01.2026 10:34, skrev Thomas Heger:       >> Am Mittwoch000031, 31.12.2025 um 08:57 schrieb The Starmaker:       >> ...       >>>       >>> https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/       >>> covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg       >>       >> 'Time' magazine suggested, that Einstein actually invented the atomic       >> bomb (or at least its theoretical foundations).       >       > No.       > But the atom bomb proved in a very convincing way       > that mass could be converted to energy as       > predicted by Einstein's E = mc².       >       >>       >> But I don't see a relation between atomic bombs and Einstein's       >> equation (which actually wasn't Einstein's invention).       >       > There is no way the atom bomb could be invented       > from the equation E = mc².       >       > And Alfred Nobel had never heard of E = mc² when he       > invented dynamite. But the detonation of dynamite       > is another proof of mass converted to energy.       >       >>       >> Investors of the foundations of atomic bombs were:       >> Otto Hahn       >> Marie Curie       >> Leo Szillard       >> Edward Teller       >> ...       >       > Don't forget Lisa Meitner who worked together with Otto Hahn       > before the war. Otto Hahn got the Nobel price in chemistry 1944,'       > and many thought that it should be shared with Lisa Meitner.              Sure, I forgot Lise Meitner. Sorry.              But there had certainly been numerous others, who contributed something.              ...       >>>       >>>       >>> 1905 refers to theory of relativity.       >>       >> But the article 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' (commonly       >> called SRT) didn't contain that equation.       >>       >> So: which paper of 1905 actually did?       >       > https://paulba.no/paper/Einstein_mc2.pdf       >              Thanks!              I have never seen that paper before.              TH              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca