From: x@x.net   
      
   On 1/2/26 12:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   > x wrote:   
   >> On 1/1/26 08:19, Stefan Ram wrote:   
   >>   > "Paul.B.Andersen"  wrote or quoted:   
   >>   > :that mass could be converted to energy as   
   >>   > :predicted by Einstein's E = mc².   
   >>   >   
   >>   >    I can spot three mistakes here right off the bat.   
   >>   >   
   >>   >         First, the phrase "mass could be converted to energy" is based   
   on   
   >>   >    a misconception, since mass already /is/ a form of energy - there's   
   no   
   >>   >    "conversion" happening. It's like saying, "water can be turned into a   
   >>   >    liquid" - no, water /is/ a liquid.   
   >   
   > Correct.   
   >   
   >> The basic problem is that you think that 'science' is   
   >> 'automatically true' [...]   
   >   
   > No, the problem is that you have no clue what you are talking about, but you   
   > are too incompetent to realize that:   
      
   You appear to be afraid of being omniscient, however I   
   do not know if I will make any note of it on usenet.   
      
   I do not care if you are omniscient or not.  I am   
   thinking that if you are an omniscient being, but   
   are either lying or never explain yourself, then   
   your omniscience is useless to me?  I am not sure.   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Also, you have posted this twice.   
      
   I was aware that I posted this twice earlier, and I do not   
   know if there is something wrong with some part of usenet   
   that makes it unable to post unless you post twice.  Should   
   I care?  Maybe or maybe not.   
      
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)