From: ttt_heg@web.de
Am Samstag000003, 03.01.2026 um 16:42 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
> Please trim your quotes to the relevant minimum, and set Followup-To when
> you crosspost. F'up2 sci.physics.relativity is set.
>
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am Freitag000002, 02.01.2026 um 11:12 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
>>>> On 01/01/2026 04:04 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>> Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> Den 01.01.2026 10:34, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>>>>> Investors of the foundations of atomic bombs were:
>>>>>>> Otto Hahn
>>>>>>> Marie Curie
>>>>>>> Leo Szillard
>>>>>>> Edward Teller
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't forget Lisa Meitner who worked together with Otto Hahn
>>>>>> before the war. Otto Hahn got the Nobel price in chemistry 1944,'
>>>>>> and many thought that it should be shared with Lisa Meitner.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read carefully. It is claimed there that those people were
>>>>> *investors" of
>>>>> the foundations where those people. It is not clear whether this is a
>>>>> mistake due to Thomas Heger's poor command of English, or whether this is
>>>>> another of his conspiracy theories. But, JFTR, they were NOT *investors*
>>>>> (people who invest money into an enterprise or a valuable token), but
>>>>> _investigators_; better: _researchers_.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but that was one of these artefacts, which only auto-correction
>>> can produce.
>>>
>>> I meant, of course, 'inventors'.
>>>
>>> An inventor is the person, who first had a certain idea for something new.
>>>
>>> Here the foundation of nuclear energy were meant with 'invention'.
>>>
>>> 'Researcher' doesn't fit here, because I wanted to express, that those
>>> were the very people in history, who developed the foundations of
>>> nuclear energy.
>>>
>>> Sure, I forgot Lise Meitner and certainly several others. But that
>>> 'first' was my intention.
>>> [...]
>>> In my opinion the equation [E = m*c^2] is wrong.
>>
>> Your opinions count for nothing.
I make a statement and write, that the equation is wrong.
The reason:
the increase of energy in form of radiation in nuclear decay is
acompanied with decrease of mass of the radioactive probe.
And because you cannot equate an increase and a decrease, the signs are
wrong.
Also wrong in Einstein's equation is, that these quantities E and m are
meant as absolute, while the nuclear decay does not show absolute
values, but 'relative' ones.
'Relative values' means, that say a milligram is missing in the nuclear
material of say 1 kg.
This is a change and not an absolute value.
How far down a nuclear decay can go, we do not know.
IOW: we cannot assume, that nuclear decay goes down to zero and makes a
sample completely vanish.
Instead we have only missing material in the middle of a curve and
cannot simply declar that curve to be linear.
This my opinion and for me it doesn't matter, whether you care or not.
...
TH
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
