From: PointedEars@web.de   
      
   Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   > On 1/5/2026 3:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >> Say to explain a 3d point in time we need (x, y, z, t), t for time.   
   >>   
   >> For a 4d point we need (x, y, z, w, t), t for time.   
   >>   
   >> t is in every dimension?   
   >>   
   >> For a 2d (x, y, t)   
   >>   
   >> For a 1d (x, t)   
   >   
   > Why not keep time in the dimension, [...]   
      
   Again, this wording does not make sense.  Time, here represented by the   
   coordinate t, *is* a dimension then *implicitly*.   
      
   --   
   PointedEars   
      
   Twitter: @PointedEars2   
   Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)