From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Thomas Heger  wrote:   
      
   > Am Sonntag000004, 04.01.2026 um 12:28 schrieb J. J. Lodder:   
   > ...   
   >   
   > >> Energy is also something else than mass, because the term 'energy'   
   > >> denotes a quantity in physics and this has a different meaning than   
   'mass'.   
   > >>   
   > >> Mass is actually a measure for resistance against acceleration and   
   > >> measured in kg.   
   > >>   
   > >> Energy is derived from the quantity work, which is defined as   
   > >> W=force*distance.   
   > >>   
   > >> The units are Newtonmeter or Joule.   
   > >>   
   > >> The quantity you erroneously call 'mass' is not measured in kg but in mol.   
   > >>   
   > >> What you actually wanted to say, that is: matter is actually immaterial   
   > >> and a form of energy.   
   > >>   
   > >> BUT: 'the amount of matter' is not measured in kg but in mol.   
   > >   
   > > You are way behind the times.   
   > > As of the CGPM 2018 both the kilogram and the joule are defined   
   > > as numerical multiples of the Hz. (with defined constants in between)   
   > > So the relation between them is a numerical constant too,   
   >   
   > Well, actually I can read and I found this on the CGPM website:   
   >   
   > "In the 14th CGPM, the SI was completed by adding mole as a base unit   
   > for amount of substance, making the total number of base units seven."   
      
   You really are way behind the times, that was more than 50 years ago.   
      
   The mole is just another defined number, these days,   
   (and it does not have any fundamental significance)   
      
   Jan   
      
   --   
   "One mole is an aggregate of exactly 6.02214076?1023 elementary   
   entities" (SI as it is nowadays)   
   ('entities' may be electrons, atoms, molecules, whatever)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)