From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl
Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 01/06/2026 01:56 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >
> >> Am Sonntag000004, 04.01.2026 um 12:28 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>> Energy is also something else than mass, because the term 'energy'
> >>>> denotes a quantity in physics and this has a different meaning than
> >>>> 'mass'.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mass is actually a measure for resistance against acceleration and
> >>>> measured in kg.
> >>>>
> >>>> Energy is derived from the quantity work, which is defined as
> >>>> W=force*distance.
> >>>>
> >>>> The units are Newtonmeter or Joule.
> >>>>
> >>>> The quantity you erroneously call 'mass' is not measured in kg but in
> >>>>mol.
> >>>>
> >>>> What you actually wanted to say, that is: matter is actually
> >>>> immaterial and a form of energy.
> >>>>
> >>>> BUT: 'the amount of matter' is not measured in kg but in mol.
> >>>
> >>> You are way behind the times.
> >>> As of the CGPM 2018 both the kilogram and the joule are defined
> >>> as numerical multiples of the Hz. (with defined constants in between)
> >>> So the relation between them is a numerical constant too,
> >>
> >> Well, actually I can read and I found this on the CGPM website:
> >>
> >> "In the 14th CGPM, the SI was completed by adding mole as a base unit
> >> for amount of substance, making the total number of base units seven."
> >
> > You really are way behind the times, that was more than 50 years ago.
> >
> > The mole is just another defined number, these days,
> > (and it does not have any fundamental significance)
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
>
> What, you never heard of "running constants"?
>
> People keep forgetting what makes the old they've
> wrapped as new then wondering why it won't sit straight.
What part of '(exactly)' don't you understand?
Jan
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
