From: PointedEars@web.de
J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>>>>> In my opinion the equation [E = m*c^2] is wrong.
>>>>>>> Your opinions count for nothing.
>>>>>> [Something is wrong with either Thomas Heger's newsreader
>>>>>> (configuration) or yours. Above, the superscript 2 for the square was
>>>>>> posted as "?". This is the 21st century; please use only up-to-date
>>>>>> and properly configured newsreaders.]
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just part of TH's (and yours)
>>>>> general incompetence in math and phys.
>>>>
>>>> LOL. I have a B Sc in Computer Science, Mathematics, Astronomy, and
>>>> soon in Physics, too.
>>>
>>> From long ago no doubt.
>>> FYI, real mathematicians and physicists understand basic TeX. .
>>> (and TeX is fool-proof, not even you could waste it)
>>> Your so-called degrees cannot be serious if you don't know about TeX.
>>
>> I encourage you to search for me on the Web to test your assumptions.
>
> Web != Usenet.
You don't say!
If you had done what I suggested, you would have found out that, among other
(La)TeX-related endeavors,
- I have written (La)TeX-like texts on Usenet many times before and continue
to do so (when more convenient);
- I have written a LaTeX 2e package for generating spacetime diagrams;
- I have improved a Personal Dictionary for Gboard with which one can
type LaTeX(-like) shortcuts on an Android-based device to produce
corresponding Unicode character( sequence)s;
- I have published several documents (scientific works) that were
generated using LaTeX, not least my first BSc thesis.
So your claiming that I, of all people, would not know about TeX, is
probably one of the most ridiculous claims that I will read this year --
and the year has just started.
But you are not even interested in the truth, are you?
>>>>> Math formulas on usenet should be rendered in ASCII,
>>>>> and nothing but ASCII, using some kind of quasi-TeX.
>>>> LOL. Welcome to the 21st century!
>>>
>>> FYI, Usenet is not from the 21st century.
>>
>> That does not mean that we have to remain in the stone age in order to use
>> it. In fact, it had been decided by the IETF long ago that that should not
>> be so; therefore, by 2009, new standards for Network News had been
>> developed, agreed upon, and already implemented by server and user agent
>> developers to facilitate that. You are simply out of touch, and if the
>> cause of the incompatibility is your newsreader (it *is*), it is not simply
>> out of date and obsolete, but *non-compliant*, i.e. *broken*.
>
> These 'improvements' are fundamentally flawed,
> so they were not generally adopted.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
> Even now, after all those years, you can still see the occasional mangled
header.
Produced by a few people who are stuck in the past like you. People like
you are not the solution, they are the problem.
>> (It is well-known in today's Usenet that MacSOUP is broken as it was never
>> updated after 2016, and was buggy even back then.)
>
> MacSoup was never broken.
I encourage you to do more research to test your assumptions.
>> And your ignoring "Followup-To: poster" indicates that you are trolling.
>>
>> Score adjusted.
>
> (arrogance noted)
> You have no right to force others to send you email.
*facepalm*
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
