XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Freitag000013, 13.02.2026 um 18:41 schrieb Bill Sloman:   
   > On 13/02/2026 8:03 pm, Thomas Heger wrote:   
   >> Am Donnerstag000012, 12.02.2026 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Brown:   
   >> ...   
   >>>>>> I've been to physics meetings that shocked me with their brutality.   
   >>>>>> That mentality is terrible for brainstorming and inventing things.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They are professionals amongst themselves. They can take it.   
   >>>>> Brutality is what keeps the brainstorming in check,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> For sure.   
   >>>   
   >>> Physicists have heard all of the deranged objections to Einsteins   
   >>> theory of relativity and general relativity so many times before that   
   >>> they are not inclined to give any quarter to hand waving wannabes   
   >>> like you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Most of these objections came actually from physicists.   
   >>   
   >> E.g. there was a physics professor with some reputation named Herbert   
   >> Dingle, who wrote 'Science at the crossroads'.   
   >>   
   >> I personally have analyzed Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of   
   >> moving bodies' of 1905 and found, that it contains roughly four-   
   >> hundred errors.   
   >>   
   >> That particular article violated all known rules for scientific papers   
   >> and contains about 100 serious(!) errors in all possible circumstances.   
   >   
   > Max Planck didn't bother to send it out for peer-review.   
      
   Sure. But I have not fully understood this fact, because Planck was   
   definitely able to see the errors in that paper.   
      
   This would lead to assume some sort of 'social engineering', which   
   forced Planck accept, what his disliked.   
      
   We can actually see this in many photo's of Einstein, when he   
   participated any conference or meeting:   
      
   Einstein sat in most cases right in the center and in the first line.   
      
   e.g. this one:   
   https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Solvay   
   conference_1927.jpg/1280px-Solvay_conference_1927.jpg   
      
   This position is, subconsciously, perceived as 'importance'.   
      
   But Einstein wasn't a good physicist at all.   
      
   So, what forces allowed Einstein to smuggle himself in the best place on   
   many pictures???   
      
   It must be kind of hidden power, which Einstein had, that had nothing at   
   all to do with physics.   
      
      
      
   >   
   >> IOW: this particular article is total crap.   
   >   
   > Except that it isn't. It didn't get cleaned up by careful peer-review   
   > because it was already quite impressive enough to get Max Planck's   
   > attention as it stood.   
      
   Sure, but 'peer reviewed crap'.   
      
      
   ...   
      
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)