XPost: sci.electronics.design
From: athel.cb@gmail.com
Thomas Heger posted:
> Am Donnerstag000012, 12.02.2026 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Brown:
> ...
> >>>> I've been to physics meetings that shocked me with their brutality.
> >>>> That mentality is terrible for brainstorming and inventing things.
> >>>
> >>> They are professionals amongst themselves. They can take it.
> >>> Brutality is what keeps the brainstorming in check,
> >>
> >> For sure.
> >
> > Physicists have heard all of the deranged objections to Einsteins theory
> > of relativity and general relativity so many times before that they are
> > not inclined to give any quarter to hand waving wannabes like you.
> >
>
> Most of these objections came actually from physicists.
>
> E.g. there was a physics professor with some reputation named Herbert
> Dingle, who wrote 'Science at the crossroads'.
>
> I personally have analyzed Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of moving
> bodies' of 1905 and found, that it contains roughly four-hundred errors.
>
> That particular article violated all known rules for scientific papers
> and contains about 100 serious(!) errors in all possible circumstances.
Ah, so we're back to that fantasy, are we? I think the time has come to stop
reading your posts.
>
> IOW: this particular article is total crap.
>
> This is interesting, because that particular article is still regarded
> as a masterpiece and the pinnacle of human endeavor.
>
> This means, that the 'community' is unable or unwilling to correct the
> errors within that paper, even if the errors are obvious and easy to
> find, because thousands of critics have already named them (many of
> them physicists!).
>
> That in turn would suggest, that physicists are collectively cheating
> and tell the public, what simply ain't true.
>
>
> TH
> ...
--
athel
Living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly in England before that
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
