XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Thomas Heger  wrote:   
      
   > Am Sonntag000015, 15.02.2026 um 22:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder:   
   > > Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Well: actually 'cold fusion' would be an option.   
   > >>   
   > >> But this would require a beam of strange particles (afair 'muons').   
   > >>   
   > >> But as a strange coincidence, one of the very few sources of such beams   
   > >> in existence was not that far away:   
   > >>   
   > >>    Brookhaven National Lab.   
   > >>   
   > >> Now building WTC7 showed a very strange pattern of the smoke it had   
   > >> emitted, which pointed directly away from the direction, in which BNL   
   > >> was located.   
   > >   
   > > Getting better all the time !   
   > >   
   > > So actually those criminals at BNL   
   > > (you know, scientists, what do you expect)   
   > > destroyed the WTC by cold muon catalysed fusion.   
   > > (just after the planes hit)   
   > >   
   > > Keep it up !   
   > >   
   > Well, that was just an IDEA!   
   >   
   > The idea was, that a facility was used inside a building at the BNL   
   > site, which had the name '911' (still has!).   
   >   
   > Only problem with this theory:   
   >   
   > BNL is about 95 km away (roughly east) and is located near Montauk in   
   > the Hamptons.   
   >   
   > Could have been a little too far away for muons.   
      
   Gosh, really?   
   Never let a mere fact to stand in the way of your great theories!   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)