Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 225,689 of 225,861    |
|    Bill Sloman to Ross Finlayson    |
|    Re: energy and mass    |
|    19 Feb 26 21:02:44    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design       From: bill.sloman@ieee.org              On 19/02/2026 7:54 am, Ross Finlayson wrote:       > On 02/18/2026 12:49 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:       >> On 02/18/2026 12:43 PM, Python wrote:       >>> Le 18/02/2026 à 20:13, Ross Finlayson a écrit :       >>> ..       >>>> and, you know, magnetic monopoles, is widely employed       >>>> in medical imaging and the like.       >>>       >>> No.       >>       >> Resonance imaging (NMR) is a thoroughly different mechanism       >> than Roentgen rays.       >>       >> Mathematically and in the theory also.       >>       >> In duck typing if it essentially is a magnetic monopole       >> then it is what it is. Now go look at skyrmions and spintronics.       >       > It's like we were just talking about Einstein and the       > "Principle of Relativity" circa 1923 when basically       > he gives an account for Electrodynamics that exactly       > the polar opposite and an inaccessible singularity       > the "having it both ways".       >       > Continuity and infinity are surely integral the       > mathematics, thus the mathematical physics,       > then here for accounts like space inversion       > and simply enough the convolutional setting       > and singular integrals and the like, and the       > hypergeometric, with the hypergeometric's       > regular singular points: zero, one, and infinity.              This is a remarkably moronic assertion.              The mathematics of integer numbers is discontinuous and doesn't depend       on any concept of infinity.              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric              covers a number of different ideas. You haven't specified what you think       you are talking about, so looks pretty much as if you are a nitwit who       doesn't know what he is talking about.              > It's not just that super-symmetry isn't dead:       > also there are at least three kinds.       >       > All one theory, where for example gravity itself       > is a giant violation of conservation of energy       > in the usual, premier theories.              More assertions that are intended to be impressive, and fail, big-time.              --       Bill Sloman, Sydney              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca