home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.relativity      The theory of relativity      225,861 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 225,692 of 225,861   
   Bill Sloman to Jeremiah Jones   
   Re: energy and mass   
   19 Feb 26 22:03:35   
   
   XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: bill.sloman@ieee.org   
      
   On 19/02/2026 7:25 pm, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   >> Am Sonntag000015, 15.02.2026 um 22:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder:   
   >>> Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Well: actually 'cold fusion' would be an option.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But this would require a beam of strange particles (afair 'muons').   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But as a strange coincidence, one of the very few sources of such beams   
   >>>> in existence was not that far away:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     Brookhaven National Lab.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now building WTC7 showed a very strange pattern of the smoke it had   
   >>>> emitted, which pointed directly away from the direction, in which BNL   
   >>>> was located.   
   >>>   
   >>> Getting better all the time !   
   >>>   
   >>> So actually those criminals at BNL   
   >>> (you know, scientists, what do you expect)   
   >>> destroyed the WTC by cold muon catalysed fusion.   
   >>> (just after the planes hit)   
   >>>   
   >>> Keep it up !   
   >>>   
   >> Well, that was just an IDEA!   
   >>   
   >> The idea was, that a facility was used inside a building at the BNL   
   >> site, which had the name '911' (still has!).   
   >>   
   >> Only problem with this theory:   
   >>   
   >> BNL is about 95 km away (roughly east) and is located near Montauk in   
   >> the Hamptons.   
   >>   
   >> Could have been a little too far away for muons.   
   >   
   > Butbutbut... muons can go right through solid earth like it's not there.   
   > They come streaming from the sun.  95 miles is just a cakewalk.   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon   
      
   They'd have about as much chance of getting through sold earth as an   
   electron beam. You musht be thinking of neutrinos. Muons have a   
   life-time of 2.2usec so if you could get them close to the speed of   
   light (which would be difficult - it's 206.7682827 times heavier than  a   
   electron) they could go about 0.66km (on average) before they decayed.   
   If you got them very close to the speed of light, time dilation could   
   let them go further - cosmic ray generated muons do get below the   
   earth's surface.   
      
   The sun might emit them but they don't get anywhere near the earth.   
      
   > The beam could spread a little, but these guys are Deep State, and they   
   > have a nice budget.  They probably built a muon laser.   
      
   They might have done, but it wouldn't have produce the effect you claim.   
      
   --   
   Bill Sloman, Sydney   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca