XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: jj@j.j   
      
   Bill Sloman  wrote:   
   > On 19/02/2026 7:25 pm, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > > Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   > >> Am Sonntag000015, 15.02.2026 um 22:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder:   
   > >>> Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Well: actually 'cold fusion' would be an option.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> But this would require a beam of strange particles (afair 'muons').   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> But as a strange coincidence, one of the very few sources of such beams   
   > >>>> in existence was not that far away:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>     Brookhaven National Lab.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Now building WTC7 showed a very strange pattern of the smoke it had   
   > >>>> emitted, which pointed directly away from the direction, in which BNL   
   > >>>> was located.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Getting better all the time !   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So actually those criminals at BNL   
   > >>> (you know, scientists, what do you expect)   
   > >>> destroyed the WTC by cold muon catalysed fusion.   
   > >>> (just after the planes hit)   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Keep it up !   
   > >>>   
   > >> Well, that was just an IDEA!   
   > >>   
   > >> The idea was, that a facility was used inside a building at the BNL   
   > >> site, which had the name '911' (still has!).   
   > >>   
   > >> Only problem with this theory:   
   > >>   
   > >> BNL is about 95 km away (roughly east) and is located near Montauk in   
   > >> the Hamptons.   
   > >>   
   > >> Could have been a little too far away for muons.   
   > >   
   > > Butbutbut... muons can go right through solid earth like it's not there.   
   > > They come streaming from the sun.  95 miles is just a cakewalk.   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon   
   >   
   > They'd have about as much chance of getting through sold earth as an   
   > electron beam.   
      
   Nope, electron beams can march right thruogh solid earth, in single   
   file, and come out the other end. Its called conduction.   
      
   Muons can do it too.   
      
   >  You musht be thinking of neutrinos. Muons have a   
   > life-time of 2.2usec so if you could get them close to the speed of   
   > light (which would be difficult - it's 206.7682827 times heavier than  a   
   > electron) they could go about 0.66km (on average) before they decayed.   
   > If you got them very close to the speed of light, time dilation could   
   > let them go further - cosmic ray generated muons do get below the   
   > earth's surface.   
   >   
   > The sun might emit them but they don't get anywhere near the earth.   
   >   
   > > The beam could spread a little, but these guys are Deep State, and they   
   > > have a nice budget.  They probably built a muon laser.   
   >   
   > They might have done, but it wouldn't have produce the effect you claim.   
      
   This is all just what they want you to think.  Are you a paid shill for   
   Deep State, or just a useful idjit?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)