XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: bill.sloman@ieee.org   
      
   On 20/02/2026 4:04 pm, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   > Bill Sloman  wrote:   
   >> On 19/02/2026 7:25 pm, Jeremiah Jones wrote:   
   >>> Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   >>>> Am Sonntag000015, 15.02.2026 um 22:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder:   
   >>>>> Thomas Heger  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Well: actually 'cold fusion' would be an option.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But this would require a beam of strange particles (afair 'muons').   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But as a strange coincidence, one of the very few sources of such beams   
   >>>>>> in existence was not that far away:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      Brookhaven National Lab.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Now building WTC7 showed a very strange pattern of the smoke it had   
   >>>>>> emitted, which pointed directly away from the direction, in which BNL   
   >>>>>> was located.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Getting better all the time !   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So actually those criminals at BNL   
   >>>>> (you know, scientists, what do you expect)   
   >>>>> destroyed the WTC by cold muon catalysed fusion.   
   >>>>> (just after the planes hit)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Keep it up !   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Well, that was just an IDEA!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The idea was, that a facility was used inside a building at the BNL   
   >>>> site, which had the name '911' (still has!).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Only problem with this theory:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> BNL is about 95 km away (roughly east) and is located near Montauk in   
   >>>> the Hamptons.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Could have been a little too far away for muons.   
   >>>   
   >>> Butbutbut... muons can go right through solid earth like it's not there.   
   >>> They come streaming from the sun.  95 miles is just a cakewalk.   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon   
   >>   
   >> They'd have about as much chance of getting through sold earth as an   
   >> electron beam.   
   >   
   > Nope, electron beams can march right through solid earth, in single   
   > file, and come out the other end. Its called conduction.   
      
   That does depend on electronic conduction. The centre of the earth is   
   metallic - mostly iron. The inner core is solid (and very hot) and   
   there's a shell of liquid iron about that, but you have to get through   
   the earth's crust to get there, and that isn't all that conductive.   
      
   An electron beam won't make it down to the (mostly) iron core.   
      
   > Muons can do it too.   
      
   Except that they can't and don't. Their 2.2usec lifetime mean that they   
   decay - to two neutrinos and and electron (or a positron for positively   
   charged muon) long before they get anywhere.   
      
   >>   You must be thinking of neutrinos. Muons have a   
   >> life-time of 2.2usec so if you could get them close to the speed of   
   >> light (which would be difficult - it's 206.7682827 times heavier than  a   
   >> electron) they could go about 0.66km (on average) before they decayed.   
   >> If you got them very close to the speed of light, time dilation could   
   >> let them go further - cosmic ray generated muons do get below the   
   >> earth's surface.   
   >>   
   >> The sun might emit them but they don't get anywhere near the earth.   
   >>   
   >>> The beam could spread a little, but these guys are Deep State, and they   
   >>> have a nice budget.  They probably built a muon laser.   
   >>   
   >> They might have done, but it wouldn't have produce the effect you claim.   
   >   
   > This is all just what they want you to think.  Are you a paid shill for   
   > Deep State, or just a useful idjit?   
      
   The idiot here is you.   
      
   --   
   Bill Sloman, Sydney   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)