XPost: sci.electronics.design   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Donnerstag000019, 19.02.2026 um 10:45 schrieb Bill Sloman:   
   > On 19/02/2026 6:13 am, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >> On 02/18/2026 11:06 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>> On 02/17/2026 08:35 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:   
   >>>> On 18/02/2026 5:37 am, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 02/17/2026 09:47 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:   
   >>>>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 02/17/2026 03:49 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> You forgot about the everlasting tinfoil hats...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> These days they call it "EMF shielding". Or "off-grid".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, by stupid people.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> F'up2 sci.physics   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh, it's well-known that exposure to high-intensity   
   >>>>> radio waves has observable and demonstrable physiological   
   >>>>> effects,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you put your head in a microwave your brain will get cooked.   
   >>>> Some unfortunate radar technicians got bits of their brains warmed up   
   >>>> enough to do observable damage   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> some have that for example the various post-natal   
   >>>>> development syndromes since the 90's are highly correlated   
   >>>>> to it ambiently, about a perceived reasoning for a   
   >>>>> "Clean, and Quiet, Air Act", where the "Clean Air Act"   
   >>>>> was a set of regulatory legislation that can definitely   
   >>>>> be related to improved outcomes (in health and life).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bad statisticians are good at confusing correlation with causation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> A simple "death ray" can be fabricated for about $15.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So what.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> The surface, as it may be, electromagnetic waves   
   >>>>> in the brain, are yet only that, and matters of   
   >>>>> resonance theory and as well the redundant sorts   
   >>>>> of aspects of the brain as electro-chemical soup,   
   >>>>> make that many usual accounts of electroencephalograms   
   >>>>> are about as advanced scientifically as "Scientologists'".   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The brain has a lot of electro-chemical structure, but the electrical   
   >>>> activity is slow and the associated electromagnetic waves would have   
   >>>> enormous wavelengths.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If there are electromagnetic resonances inside the skull they'd be at   
   >>>> frequencies way above anything the nervous system could react to   
   >>>> electro-chemically, and the electrical resistance of electrically   
   >>>> conducting body fluids would damp them heavily.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Any suggestion that anything beyond warming up the tissues involved is   
   >>>> going on is a silly as scientology.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Electro-encephlograms are observed at the outside surface of the skull,   
   >>>> and don't resolve activity at the level of individual nerves. It's   
   >>>> rather like monitoring the activity in a city by looking at traffic   
   >>>> density on the motorways.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Epilepsy research and simple modern apparatus mass-produced   
   >>> in the cellular phone factor platform, may make for that   
   >>> modern neuroscience makes a lot of wild claims.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> The resonance and tuning of radio circuits, including technologies   
   >>> like heterodyne and synchrodyne, then about old-fashioned pseudo-science   
   >>> like biorhythms, can be quite personalized.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Claims of the DOD Polygraph Institute about the detection of   
   >>> veracity or lack thereof are common.   
   >>>   
   >>> That mean old looking Regenstrief or Riegenstrieff Institute,   
   >>> you'll notice buried among your phone settings many avisos   
   >>> about health related impacts of technology.   
   >>>   
   >>> The "research" related privacy laws are very self-contradictory.   
   >>   
   >> That "Neurotourist" is a good little book,   
   >> often the researchers interviewed were   
   >> self-assured assholes with an un-founded God complex   
   >> and myopic confirmation bias.   
   >   
   > There are quite a few of them around, but researchers as a population   
   > are no worse than the rest of humanity.   
   >   
   >> The Alpha Beta Gamma Delta waves or brain waves have   
   >> various ways to interpret them, basically about the   
   >> linear/non-linear and short/long wave.   
   >   
   > None of which seem to be remotely useful.   
   >   
   >> Resonance theory about things like molecular chemistry   
   >> and, you know, magnetic monopoles, is widely employed   
   >> in medical imaging and the like.   
   >   
   > It certainly wasn't when I was involved in ultrasound imaging from 1976   
   > to 1979. The X-ray and the nuclear magnetic resonance medical imaging   
   > people weren't exactly interested in "resonance theory" either.   
   >   
   > Magnetic monopoles were hypothesised by Paul Dirac in 1931.   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole   
   >   
   > People have been looking for them ever since, but they don't seem to exist.   
      
   also the Frenche George Lochak wrote about monopoles:   
      
   "Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole"   
      
   https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf   
      
   This is an interesting paper, because it describes tranmutation!   
      
   I have never understood, how monopoles come into play, but I liked the   
   idea of transmutation,   
      
   (that, btw, had to do with my critique on 'materialism').   
      
   ...   
      
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)