Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 176,871 of 178,769    |
|    Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
|    How Monkeys see the World (Re: What is i    |
|    23 Oct 24 22:44:33    |
      From: janburse@fastmail.fm              Hi,              One could now assume that this dualism       prevents artificial intelligence. Because       seeing “pink” leads to feeling “pink”.       In this respect, this is also a very              interesting book, perhaps of historical interest?              How Monkeys See the World       ”A fascinating intellectual odyssey and a       superb summary of where science stands.”       https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo3774491.html              My guess ChatGPT proves that dualism does       not prevent artificial intelligence. And       how does ChatGPT manage it?              I suspect the Knowlegde Acquisition       Bottleneck has been cracked. Even though       ChatGPT doesn't have a "Pink" feeling,              it still has the semantic network of "Pink"       and can have a say. It was already heard through       the grapevine in 2018 that something was being              done, but back then it was a rather skeptical vote:              Did We Just Replace the ‘Knowledge Bottleneck’       With a ‘Data Bottleneck’?       https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/did-we-just-replace-the-knowledge-       ottleneck-with-a-data-bottleneck/              The "Too good to be true, in fact." turned into       a "Heureka, it works!" right before our eyes.       The date of birth was:              Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3)       OpenAI - 28. Mai 2020, Wired reported that       GPT-3 "sends shivers down spines in Silicon Valley."       https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_Pre-trained_Transformer_3#Rezeption              Have Fun!              Mild Shock schrieb:       > Hi,       >       > So this study colleague with his Flavia, the female       > mathematician, has given me something to think about.       > Why don't I react exactly the same as him?       >       > Maybe he's a different strain of homosapiens?       > And therefore rules differently than me, at least       > I never had a fetish for female mathematicians,       >       > a contradiction to determinism?       > Ha ha, now I can feed you something again:       >       > What is it Like to be a Bat?       > the hard problem of consciousness       > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaZbCctlll4       >       > Bye       >       > Mild Shock schrieb:       >> Just reading:       >>       >> "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical       >> or computer model of nature, and see       >> the Earth as a living organism, which       >> should be treated and understood accordingly"       >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources       >>       >> Now that we enter the age of AI. What       >> about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth       >> Computer model? Any pointers?       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca