From: x@x.org   
      
   On 11/23/24 08:13, Jim Pennino wrote:   
   > Bertietaylor  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 4:16:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Bertietaylor  wrote:   
   >>>> Damn fool that useless Uncle Al. It dismissed Arindam's HTN on law of   
   >>>> conservation of energy grounds.   
   >>>   
   >>> As would anyone not a raving, delusional crackpot.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Penisnino adequately represents those most kindly called raving,   
   >   
   > Just yet more penis obsessed, delusional ranting and raving deleted.   
   >   
   >> Woof-woof woof woof woof woof woof woof   
   >   
   > You are original in one sense Arindam. Of all the ranting, raving,   
   > delusionally insane crackpots that have posted their utter nonsense here   
   > over the years, you are the first one that is in fact literally barking mad.i   
      
   Yea I remember reading Hobbe's 'Leviathan' a while back.   
      
   He wrote in the 1600s.  He said there were two major   
   theories about persons with excessive anger or 'madness'.   
      
   One was that they had diseases of the organs or infirmity   
   of the body and the other was that they are demoniacs.   
      
   I guess there is Dawkins in modern times who considers   
   himself to be an 'atheist' but does not specify the   
   god that he does NOT believe in.  (Like that guy that   
   wrote 'On the god of Socrates' in ancient times.  Something   
   such as 'the gods send messengers to men' or 'angelos'   
   for 'messenger'.)  This 'people are walking bags of   
   memes' idea has existed for some while with 'meme'   
   being ancient 'sprits' renamed in a lot of ways.  Then   
   of course the word 'diabolis' means 'to cast against'.   
      
   There is of course 'conservation of energy' and low   
   and high 'entropy'.  And of course there is Montesquieu's   
   'The Spirit of the Laws' which could be summarized as   
   'there are laws of god, laws of man, and laws of nature'.   
   If you want to get philosophical, there is the question -   
   'do physical laws exist', or are they simply ideals that   
   are not actually observed in reality.  What path does   
   a bird decide to fly toward?  Can you actually model   
   that in a reliable manner?  Does that really reduce   
   to a simple equation or not?  Perhaps the world is   
   mostly chaos and entropy anyway in the physical   
   world that is actually observed.  It would be nice   
   to dream about a world in the future where both   
   mind uploading and time travel were able to be   
   coupled together to produce actual afterlives upon   
   death, but of course if the summation of all of   
   our 'entropy' adds up to this not being possible   
   either individually or en masse, then perhaps   
   the 'evil' or 'entropy' that we do now gradually   
   destroys the possibility of that ever happening.   
   Yea some of this 'diabolis' or 'to cast against'   
   in this group is rather bad, and I have been   
   doing it also.   
      
      
      
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)