[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> other than under the supervision of a crossing guard, which in analogy   
   >> form would relate to varying levels of care vs carelessness...both of   
   >> the individuals and of the crossing guard (because using a guard is no   
   >> guarantee of never getting hit & killed by a car).   
   >>   
   >>> Can I conclude, then, that you're chicken? :)   
   >>   
   >> Nah, just better informed & less reckless than I was in the past.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   >   
   > But still a chicken. If you are better informed now then you'd be   
   > trading, but more carefully.   
      
   Or that from Maslow's hierarchy of needs, I'm where you claim I'm at:   
   higher up on the hierarchy such that those needs are being met.   
      
   A sports analogy is a team with a big lead. They have the freedom to   
   take fewer injury risks, run out the clock, & still comfortably win.   
      
      
   > But you packed and left the whole thing to others to manage.   
      
   Whereas the real answer is 100% self-managed since 2018.   
      
      
   > You don't trust yourself. I do :)   
      
   Partly correct, because I know that my cognitive decline is inevitable   
   with age, so my plans factor this in: a drive towards simplification &   
   having it be robustly resistant to errors/mistakes or shortfalls.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)