XPost: sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 3/21/25 11:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 03/21/2025 12:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:   
      
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Researchers in foundations and physics know that   
   >>> the data thusly makes it so that the theories of   
   >>> mechanics and the optical sort of demand a retro-classical   
   >>> super-classical account of that the theory is a theory   
   >>> of fields of potential, and that optical light is special   
   >>> and is not the same as electromagnetic or nuclear radiation,   
   >>> and that the mechanical has "worlds turn" or for the   
   >>> free rotational, with space/frames and frame/spaces, and   
   >>> while still setting up the Galilean and Newtonian and   
   >>> Lorentzian in the middle, though not necessarily keeping   
   >>> the gravitational equivalence principle, with regards to   
   >>> the orbifold instead of the geodesy, and that there's   
   >>> that momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that   
   >>> it's a continuum mechanics what makes any quantum mechanics,   
   >>> with wave/resonance dichotomy above particle/wave duality,   
   >>> so that it results the old linear classical is just a   
   >>> mere differential time-slice, that is itself always   
   >>> a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials least-action least-gradient,   
   >>> theory.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> The truth is...particles do not behave like waves.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> And your 'one sentence paragrah' looks like it was writen by a girl with   
   >> her panties in a knot.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yeah, shut the fuck up, you frivolous moron.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
      
   I see Kosmanson does not like a much more efficiently active rival :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)