XPost: sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: x@x.org   
      
   On 03/22/2025 09:43 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > On 3/21/25 11:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >> On 03/21/2025 12:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Researchers in foundations and physics know that   
   >>>> the data thusly makes it so that the theories of   
   >>>> mechanics and the optical sort of demand a retro-classical   
   >>>> super-classical account of that the theory is a theory   
   >>>> of fields of potential, and that optical light is special   
   >>>> and is not the same as electromagnetic or nuclear radiation,   
   >>>> and that the mechanical has "worlds turn" or for the   
   >>>> free rotational, with space/frames and frame/spaces, and   
   >>>> while still setting up the Galilean and Newtonian and   
   >>>> Lorentzian in the middle, though not necessarily keeping   
   >>>> the gravitational equivalence principle, with regards to   
   >>>> the orbifold instead of the geodesy, and that there's   
   >>>> that momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that   
   >>>> it's a continuum mechanics what makes any quantum mechanics,   
   >>>> with wave/resonance dichotomy above particle/wave duality,   
   >>>> so that it results the old linear classical is just a   
   >>>> mere differential time-slice, that is itself always   
   >>>> a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials least-action least-gradient,   
   >>>> theory.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> The truth is...particles do not behave like waves.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> And your 'one sentence paragrah' looks like it was writen by a girl with   
   >>> her panties in a knot.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, shut the fuck up, you frivolous moron.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I see Kosmanson does not like a much more efficiently active rival :)   
   >   
      
   Yea there is a religion called 'psychology' or the   
   worship of Psyche, the wife of Cupid, that has terms   
   called 'word salad'.   
      
   There are words like 'point' and 'curve' in analytical   
   geometry, but are they supposed to be the same as   
   'particle' or 'wave'?  Yes?  No?  Maybe?  People   
   are jumping up and down in physics and shouting 'no   
   one can understand me because I AM WORD SALAD.   
   I am not just esoteric, people should actually   
   pay me more money!!!  The second that someone   
   asks someone else - what is a particle and   
   what is a wave?  How is it similar to point   
   or curve in mathematics and how is it different?   
   Then people shout 'baby' 'baby' 'stupid' 'stupid'.   
      
   Psychology also has come up with a term called   
   the 'Dunning Kruger effect'.  This is because   
   most people are fed lies on something called   
   'television and radio' that constantly feed   
   them the illusion of knowledge while constantly   
   feeding them lies with only the illusion of   
   knowledge at the same time.  People are generally   
   incapable of telling the difference and this   
   constantly has destructive effects all over   
   the place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)